Labor: EEOC educates teen workers about workplace laws
Employers who recruit and hire teens should be aware that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is focusing more on young workers.
October 01, 2012 at 06:21 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Employers who recruit and hire teens should be aware that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is focusing more on young workers. The agency recently issued a press release describing new anti-discrimination and harassment efforts targeted at students who are entering the workforce. Through its Youth@Work initiative, the EEOC has published a video and supplemental guidelines designed to inform students what situations and actions the EEOC considers discrimination or harassment in the workplace.
The video compiles a series of vignettes that purportedly depict typical workplace settings for teens. Each vignette considers various on-the-job interactions and concludes with a discussion aimed at identifying which interactions constituted discrimination and/or harassment. The EEOC also created accompanying classroom guides to accompany the video designed to help students “identify illegal discrimination and harassment.”
The announcement emphasizes the EEOC's push to educate the young workforce about their rights as employees. As stated by the EEOC, the Youth@Work Initiative was established with the goal of “empowering” young workers. The program's website contains information and resources on relevant laws and specifically includes guidance on filing a complaint with the agency.
In addition to creating and maintaining these resources, the agency is also focusing on youth employment through its litigation efforts. A case in point is the recent $1 million settlement of a federal lawsuit that the EEOC brought in Wisconsin against the operator of several fast food restaurants. The allegations against the restaurant included sexual harassment and retaliation against several workers, including teenagers. Not only was the employer required to pay the substantial penalty, but it is also subject to training, reporting and monitoring obligations under a consent decree.
Earlier this year, the EEOC also invited teenagers to its Denver field office to “participate in a dialogue for solutions on how to bridge the gender wage gap in America.” According to the Denver EEOC Field Director, “The EEOC believes that teenagers…represent an unbiased group that may have the ability to solve a problem that has plagued generations.”
Employers that recruit and hire teens should note that the EEOC is placing special focus on this demographic. The EEOC will likely take an aggressive stance toward allegations of discrimination and harassment involving young people who are new to the workforce. The EEOC's recent announcement is a reminder that employers should emphasize that non-discrimination and non-harassment policies apply to all employees, especially teen workers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKeys to Maximizing Efficiency (and Vibes) When Navigating International Trade Compliance Crosschecks
6 minute readLSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
7 minute readExits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Apply Now: Superior Court Judge Sought for Mountain Judicial Circuit Bench
- 2Harrisburg Jury Hands Up $1.5M Verdict to Teen Struck by Underinsured Driver
- 3Former Director's Retaliation Suit Cleared to Move Forward Against Hospice Provider
- 4New York Judge Steps Down After Conviction for Intoxicated Driving
- 5Keys to Maximizing Efficiency (and Vibes) When Navigating International Trade Compliance Crosschecks
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250