Beverage industry groups sue to block NYC sugary drink ban
Members of the beverage and restaurant industries filed a lawsuit Friday challenging New York Citys impending ban on sugary drinks, arguing that Mayor Michael Bloombergs Board of Health does not have the authority to pass the measure.
October 15, 2012 at 07:45 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Members of the beverage and restaurant industries filed a lawsuit Friday challenging New York City's impending ban on sugary drinks, arguing that Mayor Michael Bloomberg's Board of Health does not have the authority to pass the measure.
The plaintiffs, including the National Restaurant Association and the American Beverage Association, argue that only the city council—which is a legislative, rather than executive, body—has the authority to approve the law. “This case is not about obesity in New York City,” the lawsuit says. “This case is about the Board of Health, appointed by the mayor, bypassing the proper legislative process for governing the city.”
The city's Board of Health voted in September to approve the measure, which is scheduled to take effect on March 12, 2013. The ban will prohibit businesses such as restaurants, delis, movie theaters and stadiums from selling sodas or sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces. Bloomberg argues that the legislation will help to curb NYC's escalating obesity rates. According to the city, 58 percent of NYC's adults and almost 40 percent of its public school students are overweight or obese.
Critics of the measure say that it infringes on personal freedom and could harm small businesses. They also note that the ban contains many loopholes and exceptions: Customers can still buy oversized drinks in convenience stores and supermarkets. Diet sodas and alcohol- and milk-based beverages are exempt from the law. And consumers determined to skirt the ban can simply buy two 16-ounce beverages instead of one 32-ounce drink.
These arguments notwithstanding, some experts predict that businesses will have a difficult time mounting legal challenges to the legislation, as the health department has the power to regulate NYC restaurants and other eateries. Bloomberg himself has already passed several high-profile public health measures during his 11-year tenure as mayor, including a ban on smoking in most public places and a measure outlawing the use of trans fats in restaurants.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of beverage-related lawsuits, see:
Legal challenges to New York sugary drink ban may fail
New York mayor moves to ban sugary drinks, California cracks down on foie gras
New York attorney general subpoenas three energy drink makers
Pepsi inventor's children sue PepsiCo
FDCA precludes Lanham Act claims in POM's case against Coca-Cola's juice labeling
Members of the beverage and restaurant industries filed a lawsuit Friday challenging
The plaintiffs, including the National Restaurant Association and the American Beverage Association, argue that only the city council—which is a legislative, rather than executive, body—has the authority to approve the law. “This case is not about obesity in
The city's Board of Health voted in September to approve the measure, which is scheduled to take effect on March 12, 2013. The ban will prohibit businesses such as restaurants, delis, movie theaters and stadiums from selling sodas or sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces. Bloomberg argues that the legislation will help to curb NYC's escalating obesity rates. According to the city, 58 percent of NYC's adults and almost 40 percent of its public school students are overweight or obese.
Critics of the measure say that it infringes on personal freedom and could harm small businesses. They also note that the ban contains many loopholes and exceptions: Customers can still buy oversized drinks in convenience stores and supermarkets. Diet sodas and alcohol- and milk-based beverages are exempt from the law. And consumers determined to skirt the ban can simply buy two 16-ounce beverages instead of one 32-ounce drink.
These arguments notwithstanding, some experts predict that businesses will have a difficult time mounting legal challenges to the legislation, as the health department has the power to regulate NYC restaurants and other eateries. Bloomberg himself has already passed several high-profile public health measures during his 11-year tenure as mayor, including a ban on smoking in most public places and a measure outlawing the use of trans fats in restaurants.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of beverage-related lawsuits, see:
Legal challenges to
Pepsi inventor's children sue
FDCA precludes Lanham Act claims in POM's case against Coca-Cola's juice labeling
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/fd/84/3d7fb4d146d38b97cfab7af5b7c7/inside-feature-767x633-2.jpg)
Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits
7 minute read![Varsity Brands Lures Aboard Keurig Dr. Pepper Legal Chief Varsity Brands Lures Aboard Keurig Dr. Pepper Legal Chief](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/83/dc/a59e06ad42be872191fe7a086901/cheerleaders-767x633.jpg)
![Hasbro Faces Shareholder Ire Over 'Excessive' Toy, Game Inventory Hasbro Faces Shareholder Ire Over 'Excessive' Toy, Game Inventory](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/68/d7/ef03ff8a4ced831763f57095d82f/hasbro-767x633.jpg)
![CLOs Face Mounting Pressure as Risks Mushroom and Job Duties Expand CLOs Face Mounting Pressure as Risks Mushroom and Job Duties Expand](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2023/10/Businessman-juggling-business-icons-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1Connecticut Movers: New Laterals, Expanding Teams
- 2Eliminating Judicial Exceptions: The Promise of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act
- 3AI in Legal: Disruptive Potential and Practical Realities
- 4One Court’s Opinion on Successfully Bankruptcy Proofing a Borrower
- 5Making the Case for Workflow Automation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250