Big Tobacco doesn’t want to admit wrongdoing
When Big Tobacco told a federal judge that it didnt want to admit to repeatedly lying to consumers, it wasnt terribly shocking.
October 16, 2012 at 07:08 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Anyone who has ever seen “The Insider” has an opinion about how honest tobacco companies are. But still, when Big Tobacco told a federal judge that it didn't want to admit to repeatedly lying to consumers, it wasn't terribly shocking.
It all went down yesterday when cigarette makers Altria Group Inc. and Reynolds American Inc., among others, told U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler that they should not be required to tell the public that they manipulated nicotine levels to make cigarettes more addictive or that they lied about the negative health effects of light cigarettes.
The companies have been battling it out with the Justice Department for the past six years over wording their “corrective statements,” which are part of the penalty associated with Kessler's landmark 2006 decision. In that ruling, Kessler found that Big Tobacco engaged in fraud to deceive the public that went on for decades. Labels, containing these corrective statements, are slated to run in newspapers, magazines and on cigarette packages. These labels are different from the traditional warning labels on cigarette packages and the graphic labels that have also spent a fair share of time in court.
To be fair, the tobacco companies have maintained all along that they never lied to consumers—despite what Kessler concluded in her 2006 ruling.
Read more about Big Tobacco's request to maintain its innocence on Thomson Reuters.
And if you were a fan of “The Insider,” see InsideCounsel's slideshow, Top 10 corporate law movies, for other great lawyer flicks.
Also, check out more of our stories about the tobacco industry:
D.C. Circuit rules against graphic tobacco label requirements
NYC can't force displays of graphic anti-smoking ads
D.C Circuit hears graphic tobacco label case
Canadian tobacco class actions head to trial
Tobacco companies pay $6.5 billion to U.S. states
Judge says Big Tobacco's free speech rights were violated
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits
7 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Ex-Starbucks GC Exiting Latest Role, Will Get Severance
- 2Family Law Special Section 2025
- 3We Must Uphold the Rights of Immigrant Students
- 4Orrick Picks Up 13-Lawyer Tech, VC Group From Gunderson Dettmer
- 5How Alzheimer’s and Other Cognitive Diseases Affect Guardianship, POAs and Estate Planning
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
