Judge considers whether United Airlines can be blamed in World Trade Center case
Should United Airlines be held responsible for the actions of passengers on another airlines flight?
October 19, 2012 at 07:32 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Should United Airlines be held responsible for the actions of passengers on another airline's flight?
That's the question U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein is considering in a case that accuses United Continental Holdings Inc. and American Airlines of a lapse in security that allowed hijackers onto the plane that ultimately crashed into the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001.
The plaintiff in this case, World Trade Center Properties (WTCP), owned by Larry Silverstein, argues that even though the plane that crashed into the towers was an American Airlines flight, United was one of the airlines responsible for security screening at Maine's Portland International Jetport. The terrorists first flew from Portland to Boston, where they connected onto the flight they would then hijack.
“The first line of defense was Portland,” Richard Williamson, attorney for WTCP, told the court. “They were just asleep at the switch.”
However, in 2009 Hellerstein dismissed claims against other airlines in a lawsuit dealing with a United flight that also crashed into the towers. “Would I be acting inconsistently if I did not dismiss United?” Hellerstein asked.
WTCP is seeking $8.4 billion in damages for loss of property and business, but Hellerstein previously capped the World Trade Center's value at the $2.8 billion the company paid for the lease on the buildings.
Hellerstein is reserving judgment while he considers the argument.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel stories about airlines, see below:
Court says American Airlines agents may vote to unionize
Woman sues Southwest Airlines for $800,000 over hot tea
More passengers join suit against ranting JetBlue pilot
American Airlines' bid to abandon pilots' contracts fails
American defends its lawsuit against union action
Black pilots, supervisors sue United for discrimination
Breastfeeding mother settles suit with airlines
Should
That's the question U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein is considering in a case that accuses
The plaintiff in this case, World Trade Center Properties (WTCP), owned by Larry Silverstein, argues that even though the plane that crashed into the towers was an
“The first line of defense was Portland,” Richard Williamson, attorney for WTCP, told the court. “They were just asleep at the switch.”
However, in 2009 Hellerstein dismissed claims against other airlines in a lawsuit dealing with a United flight that also crashed into the towers. “Would I be acting inconsistently if I did not dismiss United?” Hellerstein asked.
WTCP is seeking $8.4 billion in damages for loss of property and business, but Hellerstein previously capped the World Trade Center's value at the $2.8 billion the company paid for the lease on the buildings.
Hellerstein is reserving judgment while he considers the argument.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel stories about airlines, see below:
Court says
Woman sues
More passengers join suit against ranting JetBlue pilot
American defends its lawsuit against union action
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Meta Hires Litigation Strategy Chief, Tapping King & Spalding Partner Who Was Senior DOJ Official in First Trump Term
Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
