Judge dismisses MF Global employee termination lawsuit
The trustees overseeing the liquidation of MF Global have one less thing to worry about, after a judge dismissed a wrongful termination suit filed by a group of the bankrupt brokerages former employees.
October 24, 2012 at 07:39 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The trustees overseeing the liquidation of MF Global have one less thing to worry about, after a judge dismissed a wrongful termination suit filed by a group of the bankrupt brokerage's former employees.
The employees had argued that they were fired without warning after the company's sudden October 2011 collapse. According to their suit, this violated the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, which requires companies to give employees 60 days' advance written notice of mass layoffs.
James Giddens and Louis Freeh, the two trustees assigned to the case, maintained that the WARN Act did not apply in this case, as liquidating companies are not subject to the same rules as traditional employers. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn agreed with the trustees, noting in his opinion that Giddens was appointed under the Securities Investors Protection Act (SIPA) and that “the only purpose of the SIPA proceeding is liquidation.”
Judge Glenn did leave the door open to further lawsuits, however. Although he dismissed the suit against MF Global Inc.—the company's brokerage arm—with prejudice, Glenn gave the plaintiffs 30 days to amend and refile their complaint against parent company MF Global Holdings Ltd., which filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11. According to Glenn, these bankruptcy cases, which are the purview of trustee Louis Freeh, “were filed at least initially with the hope of reorganization.”
MF Global collapsed last fall amid fears over its exposure to bad European debt. After the company declared bankruptcy, regulators discovered a shortfall of roughly $1.6 billion in customer-segregated funds.
Read more at the Chicago Tribune.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of MF Global, see:
MF Global trustees ask judge to dismiss improper termination lawsuit
MF Global corporate trustee confident that customers' funds will be returned
MF Global GC will testify tomorrow at House hearing
MF Global customer says entire $50 million account missing
7 banks targeted over MF Global collapse
FBI probe continues MF Global's downward spiral
MF Global's customer account discrepancies spur regulatory probe
The trustees overseeing the liquidation of MF Global have one less thing to worry about, after a judge dismissed a wrongful termination suit filed by a group of the bankrupt brokerage's former employees.
The employees had argued that they were fired without warning after the company's sudden October 2011 collapse. According to their suit, this violated the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, which requires companies to give employees 60 days' advance written notice of mass layoffs.
James Giddens and Louis Freeh, the two trustees assigned to the case, maintained that the WARN Act did not apply in this case, as liquidating companies are not subject to the same rules as traditional employers. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn agreed with the trustees, noting in his opinion that Giddens was appointed under the Securities Investors Protection Act (SIPA) and that “the only purpose of the SIPA proceeding is liquidation.”
Judge Glenn did leave the door open to further lawsuits, however. Although he dismissed the suit against MF Global Inc.—the company's brokerage arm—with prejudice, Glenn gave the plaintiffs 30 days to amend and refile their complaint against parent company MF Global Holdings Ltd., which filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11. According to Glenn, these bankruptcy cases, which are the purview of trustee Louis Freeh, “were filed at least initially with the hope of reorganization.”
MF Global collapsed last fall amid fears over its exposure to bad European debt. After the company declared bankruptcy, regulators discovered a shortfall of roughly $1.6 billion in customer-segregated funds.
Read more at the Chicago Tribune.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of MF Global, see:
MF Global trustees ask judge to dismiss improper termination lawsuit
MF Global corporate trustee confident that customers' funds will be returned
MF Global GC will testify tomorrow at House hearing
MF Global customer says entire $50 million account missing
7 banks targeted over MF Global collapse
FBI probe continues MF Global's downward spiral
MF Global's customer account discrepancies spur regulatory probe
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits
7 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
