Law school falsified jobs data, according to ex-employee
Law school graduates suing the Thomas Jefferson School of Law (TJSL) for allegedly misleading jobs data now have an unexpected ally: a former career-services employee who accused the school in court of distorting its employment statistics.
October 26, 2012 at 09:02 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Law school graduates suing the Thomas Jefferson School of Law (TJSL) for allegedly misleading jobs data now have an unexpected ally: a former career-services employee who accused the school in court of distorting its employment statistics.
Karen Grant was assistant director of career services at the school from 2006 to 2007. As part of her job, she surveyed recent TJSL graduates about their employment status. The school then reported the compiled statistics to the American Bar Association and the Association for Legal Career Professionals.
According to Grant's sworn statement, her boss instructed her to inflate job statistics by marking former students as employed if they had held a job at any point after graduation. “If the graduate indicated he or she was employed at any time after graduation (even though currently unemployed), I was instructed to record the graduate as 'employed,'” the statement reads.
Grant says the school also inflated statistics by updating its jobs data when graduates found work, but not when they became unemployed. When Grant expressed concern over these practices, her boss allegedly told her that “everybody does it.”
In a statement, TJSL called Grant's claims “meritless” and maintained that it has found no other documents or witnesses to back up her allegations.
TJSL was the first law school to face litigation from students over its job placement statistics, but it certainly wasn't the last. Upwards of 20 schools have been sued by graduates claiming that their alma maters misled them about post-grad job prospects.
Courts have dismissed three such lawsuits against Cooley Law School, DePaul University's College of Law and New York Law School. In the latter case, the judge ruled that graduates should understand that widespread reports of a bleak legal job market “obviously trump any allegedly overly optimistic claims in their law school's marketing materials.”
Read more at the Wall Street Journal.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the law school litigation, see:
Judge tosses Cooley Law grads lawsuit
Judge tosses suit against New York Law School for misleading jobs data
20 more law schools to be sued for misleading jobs data
12 law schools sued over misleading jobs data
Law school graduates suing the
Karen Grant was assistant director of career services at the school from 2006 to 2007. As part of her job, she surveyed recent TJSL graduates about their employment status. The school then reported the compiled statistics to the American Bar Association and the Association for Legal Career Professionals.
According to Grant's sworn statement, her boss instructed her to inflate job statistics by marking former students as employed if they had held a job at any point after graduation. “If the graduate indicated he or she was employed at any time after graduation (even though currently unemployed), I was instructed to record the graduate as 'employed,'” the statement reads.
Grant says the school also inflated statistics by updating its jobs data when graduates found work, but not when they became unemployed. When Grant expressed concern over these practices, her boss allegedly told her that “everybody does it.”
In a statement, TJSL called Grant's claims “meritless” and maintained that it has found no other documents or witnesses to back up her allegations.
TJSL was the first law school to face litigation from students over its job placement statistics, but it certainly wasn't the last. Upwards of 20 schools have been sued by graduates claiming that their alma maters misled them about post-grad job prospects.
Courts have dismissed three such lawsuits against
Read more at the Wall Street Journal.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the law school litigation, see:
Judge tosses
Judge tosses suit against
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhite Castle GC Becomes Chain's First President From Outside Family
Beyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Trending Stories
- 1Church of Scientology Set to Depose Phila. Attorney in Sexual Abuse Case
- 2An AG Just Specified How AI Could Get You in Hot Water
- 3Supreme Court Appears to Lean Toward Letting TikTok Ban Take Effect
- 4Standing Spat: Split 2nd Circuit Lets Challenge to Pfizer Diversity Program Proceed
- 5Judge Jablonski and Chief Justice Rabner Both Acted Completely Properly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250