Colorado, Washington legalize marijuana
Two Western states have become the first in the nation to legalize recreational marijuana use.
November 07, 2012 at 06:40 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Two Western states have become the first in the nation to legalize recreational marijuana use.
Yesterday, voters in Colorado and Washington passed initiatives to allow the possession and sale of pot for recreational use. Pro-legalization groups, such as NORML, hailed the votes as a victory, saying in a press release that “the significance of these events cannot be understated.” The Drug Policy Alliance said the outcome reflects increased national support for liberalized marijuana laws and cited a 2011 Gallup poll finding that half of Americans favored making pot legal.
Nonetheless, the federal government maintains that marijuana is an illegal drug, and experts say the battle over these states' new initiatives could end up in court. “Once these states actually try to implement these laws, we will see an effort by the Feds to shut it down,” Kevin Sabet, a former senior adviser to the Obama administration's Office of National Drug Control Policy, told NBC News.
Before the election, business leaders in Colorado voiced concerns about the marijuana initiative. Denver Mayer Michael Hancock, the head of the Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce and other organizations said legalizing pot would be bad for business in Colorado because it would discourage companies from moving to the state. “Becoming the marijuana capital of the country will not boost this progress,” Hancock said at a news conference. “It will only hurt it.”
But Colorado unions said the new marijuana measure would have the opposite effect. “Removing marijuana from the underground market … will create living-wage jobs and bolster our state and local economies with tens of millions of dollars in new tax revenue and savings,” local union president Kim Cordova told the Denver Post.
Colorado's ballot initiative states that nothing in the measure “is intended to require an employer to permit or accommodate the use, consumption, possession, transfer, display, transportation, sale or growing on marijuana in the workplace or to affect the ability of employers to have policies restricting the use of marijuana by employees.” But some business leaders worry the marijuana measure will lead to lawsuits if employers fire employees over their marijuana use. The Mountain States Employers Council says the marijuana initiative is “coyly drafted to invite litigation.”
For more marijuana-related legal coverage from InsideCounsel, read:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFinancial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250