JPMorgan, Credit Suisse settle mortgage bond charges for $417 million
JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Credit Suisse Group AG have agreed to pay $416.9 million to settle Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) allegations that the banks misled investors about the quality of their mortgage-backed securities.
November 19, 2012 at 07:56 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Credit Suisse Group AG have agreed to pay $416.9 million to settle Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) allegations that the banks misled investors about the quality of their mortgage-backed securities.
According to the agency, both banks neglected to disclose the defective nature of the mortgages they were pooling into securities and selling. In one instance, the government says, JPMorgan told investors that only four of the loans underlying one $1.8 billion block of securities were delinquent, when the real number was 620.
Investigators also allege that both banks earned millions of dollars by falsely telling investors that they would repurchase or substitute good-quality loans for defective mortgages. Instead, regulators say, the banks kept the original, faulty mortgages in loan packages that they sold to customers.
As part of the multimillion-dollar deal, JP Morgan will pay $296.9 million and Credit Suisse will pay $120 million, with all money going to harmed investors. Neither of the banks admitted wrongdoing as part of the settlement.
Last month, Congressman Barney Frank defended JPMorgan against a separate complaint filed by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, pointing out many of the complaints against the bank stemmed from wrongdoing at Bear Stearns, which JPMorgan acquired in 2008 at the behest of the federal government. “The decision now to prosecute J.P. Morgan Chase because of activities undertaken by Bear Stearns before the takeover unfortunately fits the description of allowing no good deed to go unpunished,” he said in a statement.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the financial industry, see:
According to the agency, both banks neglected to disclose the defective nature of the mortgages they were pooling into securities and selling. In one instance, the government says, JPMorgan told investors that only four of the loans underlying one $1.8 billion block of securities were delinquent, when the real number was 620.
Investigators also allege that both banks earned millions of dollars by falsely telling investors that they would repurchase or substitute good-quality loans for defective mortgages. Instead, regulators say, the banks kept the original, faulty mortgages in loan packages that they sold to customers.
As part of the multimillion-dollar deal,
Last month, Congressman Barney Frank defended JPMorgan against a separate complaint filed by
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the financial industry, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSenators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anticompetitive Practices, Fees
Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
Trump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readFTC Sues Cash-Advance Fintech Dave, Says It Deceives the 'Financially Vulnerable'
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-68
- 2Friday Newspaper
- 3Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 4Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 5NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250