Clorox will expand pro bono program
Legal department has soft-launched two new initiatives that will grow next year
November 27, 2012 at 07:00 PM
3 minute read
Trademark counsel Adam Brink was thrilled when Laura Stein came on board as general counsel of The Clorox Co. in 2005. Not only did she bring valuable leadership experience as the former GC of the H.J. Heinz Co., but she also had a passion for pro bono—something he had been wanting to prioritize within the Clorox legal department.
“With her support and encouragement, we set up a pro bono committee and drafted a mission statement,” Brink says.
The committee aimed to have a strong local impact, so it focused on projects benefitting low-income individuals in Oakland, Calif., where Clorox is headquartered.
One of the first places Clorox lawyers got involved was the Family Violence Law Center, which helps victims of domestic violence get restraining orders against their abusers. Soon after, Clorox lawyers also began working on Project Clean Slate at the East Bay Community Law Center, headquartered nearby in Berkeley. The project works with individuals who have criminal records to help them successfully re-enter society. Clorox lawyers assist them in drafting declarations they can present to judges, who can then expunge certain types of criminal offenses from their records so that they have better chances of obtaining jobs or housing.
Clorox lawyers are still involved with the Family Violence Law Center and Project Clean Slate, but Brink says they soon will have even more pro bono options. “We are going through a refresh right now,” he says. “Our department has grown, and we want to examine how the pro bono program can be improved. Our goal is to find initiatives that enable everybody to feel like they can participate.”
Brink says the committee has soft-launched two new initiatives that will become much larger in 2013. One project is the Housing Negotiation Clinic, through which Clorox lawyers team up with Morrison & Foerster to represent tenants in disputes with their landlords. The other project is volunteering through the California Lawyers for the Arts, which helps people in the arts community with intellectual property-related issues. “About a third of the attorneys in our department focus their time on IP, so this is a good initiative for us,” Brink says.
Brink says there are three reasons Clorox has seen success in its pro bono program. First, the pro bono committee comprises individuals who serve as liaisons between the legal department and the organizations where Clorox lawyers volunteer. “They're a huge part of this program,” Brink says. “Not only do they volunteer their time, but they also communicate the organizations' needs and coordinate all the efforts for the department.”
Second, Clorox's pro bono program doesn't infringe on employees' personal time. “Laura wanted to make very clear that these initiatives are during working hours, and it's valuable enough to the community and Clorox that people take time from their work to volunteer,” Brink says.
Finally, and most importantly, he says, volunteerism is ingrained in Clorox's culture. “There's a very real culture of being part of the community here,” he says. “As a lawyer, being part of the community means volunteering, but it also means using our legal skills.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readPreparing for 2025: Anticipated Policy Changes Affecting U.S. Businesses Under the Trump Administration
Trending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250