Supreme Court will hear two cases on gay marriage
The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it has decided to hear two of the five cases brought before it regarding marriage equality.
December 10, 2012 at 05:07 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it has decided to hear two of the five cases brought before it regarding marriage equality. This is the first time the high court has entered the debate on gay marriage, and its decision, expected by June, will be a defining legal moment on the controversial issue.
One of the cases the Supreme Court will hear involves California's Proposition 8, which passed in 2008 and bars gay marriage in the state. The second case the high court agreed to take comes from New York and involves the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). Passed in 1996, DOMA mandates that the federal government does not recognize same sex marriage in states where it's legal and denies federal benefits to same sex couples. At least two appeals courts have already found DOMA to be unconstitutional.
Although the justices aren't saying why they chose the cases they did, the Wall Street Journal Law Blog gives its thoughts on why these two suits rose to the surface.
With much support, the move toward marriage equality seems inevitable. In May, President Barack Obama came out in support of gay marriage—the first president ever to do so. And nine states and Washington, D.C., have already legalized gay marriage—three of them most recently as on Election Day in November.
Read more InsideCounsel stories about marriage equality and other LGBT issues:
The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it has decided to hear two of the five cases brought before it regarding marriage equality. This is the first time the high court has entered the debate on gay marriage, and its decision, expected by June, will be a defining legal moment on the controversial issue.
One of the cases the Supreme Court will hear involves California's Proposition 8, which passed in 2008 and bars gay marriage in the state. The second case the high court agreed to take comes from
Although the justices aren't saying why they chose the cases they did, the Wall Street Journal Law Blog gives its thoughts on why these two suits rose to the surface.
With much support, the move toward marriage equality seems inevitable. In May, President Barack Obama came out in support of gay marriage—the first president ever to do so. And nine states and Washington, D.C., have already legalized gay marriage—three of them most recently as on Election Day in November.
Read more InsideCounsel stories about marriage equality and other LGBT issues:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFinancial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250