Right-to-work law passes in Michigan amid protests
As of Tuesday, Michigan is now the 24th right-to-work state in the U.S.
December 13, 2012 at 06:16 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
As of Tuesday, Michigan is now the 24th right-to-work state in the U.S. “Right-to-work” essentially means banning mandatory union membership from workplaces, and for a state that's known for its organized labor in the auto industry, this law will have a big impact. Michigan has the fifth-highest percentage of workers who belong to unions in the country—17.5 percent.
Michigan's Republican-dominated House of Representatives approved a pair of bills—for private and public sector unions—on Tuesday, as more than 12,000 union workers and supporters protested in the state capital of Lansing. The protests turned ugly when the police got involved, donning riot gear, and in at least one case, using pepper spray to subdue the demonstrators.
For his part, Republican Governor Rick Snyder signed the bills into law as soon as they crossed his desk, and they are expected to take effect sometime in April. “I view this as an opportunity to stand up for Michigan's workers, to be pro-worker,” Snyder said in a press conference afterward.
Supporters of the bills extol the choice they offer laborers of joining a union or not, and claim that more flexibility will be good for business. Opponents argue that these bills will reduce union membership and undermine unions' ability to collectively bargain with employers for things like better wages and working conditions.
The right-to-work push by lame duck Snyder is seen, at least in part, as an attempt to weaken the Democratic Party in the state. Unions have traditionally been a major source of grass-roots support for liberals. The Atlantic predicts that this skirmish in Michigan is foreshadowing of future labor battles in other states such as Wisconsin, Ohio and New Jersey, where the 2014 gubernatorial races may shape the future of unions.
Read more about right-to-work laws on InsideCounsel:
Right-to-work bill advances in Indiana
Ohio group seeks right-to-work amendment
Union sues to block enforcement of Indiana right-to-work law
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat to Know About the New 'Overlapping Directorship' Antitrust Development
4 minute readThe Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
Tesla, Musk Appeal Chancery Compensation Case to Delaware Supreme Court
2 minute readTurning Over Legal Tedium to AI Requires Lots of Unglamorous Work on Front End
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250