Domestic violence law guide
Details of states' victims' rights laws vary significantly
December 20, 2012 at 07:00 PM
3 minute read
At least 14 states, the District of Columbia and a handful of municipalities have passed laws guaranteeing domestic violence victims (and in some states, victims of assault and stalking) time off from work to seek medical, counseling or legal help; meet with law enforcement officials and participate in court hearings; and find a safe place to live, according to Legal Momentum, a women's legal defense and education fund.
The details of the laws vary significantly. California and Illinois provide up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave per year, and Colorado and Florida only require up to three days.
Illinois' law is among the broadest, prohibiting discrimination and retaliation against employees who are victim of domestic violence. Under the Victims' Economic Security and Safety Act, employers with 15 or more employees also cannot take actions against an employee on the basis of disruptions or threatened disruptions of the workplace by someone who has committed or threatened domestic or sexual violence against the employee. The employer must make reasonable accommodations related to the violence, such as a changed telephone number, transfer, modified schedule or time off, unless such accommodation would pose an undue hardship.
At least 14 states, the District of Columbia and a handful of municipalities have passed laws guaranteeing domestic violence victims (and in some states, victims of assault and stalking) time off from work to seek medical, counseling or legal help; meet with law enforcement officials and participate in court hearings; and find a safe place to live, according to Legal Momentum, a women's legal defense and education fund.
The details of the laws vary significantly. California and Illinois provide up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave per year, and Colorado and Florida only require up to three days.
Illinois' law is among the broadest, prohibiting discrimination and retaliation against employees who are victim of domestic violence. Under the Victims' Economic Security and Safety Act, employers with 15 or more employees also cannot take actions against an employee on the basis of disruptions or threatened disruptions of the workplace by someone who has committed or threatened domestic or sexual violence against the employee. The employer must make reasonable accommodations related to the violence, such as a changed telephone number, transfer, modified schedule or time off, unless such accommodation would pose an undue hardship.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
AI Adoption, Data Center Building Boom Opening More Doors for Cybercriminals, Many of Them Teenagers
Another Senior Boeing Attorney Exits, This One for CLO Post at Jet-Maintenance Company
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Brown Rudnick’s Brand and Reputation Group Unfazed After Loss of 6 Prominent Partners and Their Big-Name Clients
- 2Fulton Judge Weighs Whether to Order Fani Willis to Comply With Lawmakers' Subpoenas Over Trump Case
- 3Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
- 4Judge Rises to Tifton Superior Court Bench
- 5'It's Like They Lynched You:' Law Professor's Discrimination Claim Reaches High Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250