FTC updates online child privacy rules, gives app sellers a pass
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on Wednesday updated its child online privacy rules to reflect the burgeoning growth of social networking and smartphone apps.
December 20, 2012 at 07:37 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on Wednesday updated its child online privacy rules to reflect the burgeoning growth of social networking and smartphone apps. But, in a change from an earlier proposal, app stores run by companies such as Google Inc. and Apple Inc. will not be liable for privacy violations resulting from third-party apps or plug-ins, the Wall Street Journal Law Blog reports.
The FTC launched a review of the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) in 2010, amid concerns that the 1998 law had not kept pace with new technologies. This summer, the FTC proposed a series of amendments to COPPA, including new measures that would hold companies responsible for selling third-party apps that collect children's personal data if the company “knows or has reason to know” that such violations are occurring. According to a recent FTC report, many kids' mobile apps gather data from users and sent it to the app developer, advertisers or analytics companies.
But tech giants such as Apple, Google, Twitter and Facebook quickly launched lobbying efforts to prevent the passage of such a rule. Now the companies will not be held responsible if third-party plug ins—such as Facebook's “Like” button—collect information from children, unless the company has “actual knowledge” of the prohibited activities.
The updated COPPA does strengthen some privacy measures, however, by requiring apps and social networks to obtain parental consent before collecting data such as photos, videos or a child's geographic location. They also must have a parent's approval to use tracking tools such as cookies.
“I am confident that the amendments to the COPPA Rule strike the right balance between protecting innovation that will provide rich and engaging content for children, and ensuring that parents are informed and involved in their children's online activities,” FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz said in a statement.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of technology and privacy concerns, see:
Celebrity fan sites fined for COPPA violations
Judge OKs Facebook's revised privacy settlement
Manhattan DA receives $4.2 million to build cybercrime lab
LinkedIn sued over data breach
Technology: We have met the enemy, and he is us
E-discovery: 5 things every company should consider when developing a BYOD policy
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on Wednesday updated its child online privacy rules to reflect the burgeoning growth of social networking and smartphone apps. But, in a change from an earlier proposal, app stores run by companies such as
The FTC launched a review of the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) in 2010, amid concerns that the 1998 law had not kept pace with new technologies. This summer, the FTC proposed a series of amendments to COPPA, including new measures that would hold companies responsible for selling third-party apps that collect children's personal data if the company “knows or has reason to know” that such violations are occurring. According to a recent FTC report, many kids' mobile apps gather data from users and sent it to the app developer, advertisers or analytics companies.
But tech giants such as
The updated COPPA does strengthen some privacy measures, however, by requiring apps and social networks to obtain parental consent before collecting data such as photos, videos or a child's geographic location. They also must have a parent's approval to use tracking tools such as cookies.
“I am confident that the amendments to the COPPA Rule strike the right balance between protecting innovation that will provide rich and engaging content for children, and ensuring that parents are informed and involved in their children's online activities,” FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz said in a statement.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of technology and privacy concerns, see:
Celebrity fan sites fined for COPPA violations
Judge OKs Facebook's revised privacy settlement
Manhattan DA receives $4.2 million to build cybercrime lab
Technology: We have met the enemy, and he is us
E-discovery: 5 things every company should consider when developing a BYOD policy
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAntitrust in Trump 2.0: Expect Gap Filling from State Attorneys General
6 minute readIn-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
FTC Chair Lina Khan Sues John Deere Over 'Right to Repair,' Infuriates Successor
6 minute readFTC Launches Inquiry of Single-Family Rental Home 'Mega Investors,' Issues PBM Report
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
- 5Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to a Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250