Facts & Figures: GCs are becoming more involved in business strategy
From mammoth mergers to profitable practice areas, an inside look at the numbers that count
January 18, 2013 at 07:53 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Merger Mavens
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom topped Thomson Reuters' list of law firms that advised on the highest-value mergers and acquisition deals last year, jumping from the No. 6 spot it earned in 2011. Skadden's success was partially due to several whopping transactions, including Rosneft Oil Co.'s $56 billion acquisition of Russian oil producer TNK-BP. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett—last year's top M&A adviser—and Sullivan & Cromwell rounded out the top three spots.
200 Deals that Skadden Arps advised on in 2012, down from 201 the previous year
$316 billion Total value of those deals, up from $233 billion in 2011
133 Deals that Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, the second-place firm, advised on in 2012
$281 billion Total value of those deals, down from $295 billion in 2011
Discovery Decisions
E-discovery is certainly a buzzword in the legal industry these days, as courts across the country continue to issue decisions on the subject. Kroll Ontrack recently analyzed all of those opinions and found that most e-discovery decisions dealt with sanctions cases, although procedural disputes gained ground as a popular subject of judicial opinions.
32% Cases that addressed sanctions for issues such as preservation, spoliation and production disputes, a decrease of 10 percent since 2011
29% Cases that discussed procedural issues such as search protocol, production and privilege
14% Cases that discussed cost considerations, such as cost-shifting of e-discovery expenses
9% Cases that mentioned technology-assisted review or predictive coding, which had never been discussed in a reported opinion before February 2012's ruling in Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe
Compliance Concerns
Anti-bribery laws—namely the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Bribery Act—have been making headlines in recent months, as companies from Wal-Mart to Pfizer have been caught up in corruption allegations. But it's not just U.S. businesses that may be vulnerable to violations of these laws. A recent survey of Asia-Pacific companies by Kroll Advisory Solutions found that fewer than half of the companies surveyed had performed risk assessments on their exposure to the two acts.
48.7% Companies surveyed that had thoroughly assessed their vulnerability to enforcement of the two acts
51.3% Companies that had not completed such assessments, and either did not know the effectiveness of their compliance systems or believed their internal controls to be insufficient
70% Companies in the Asia-Pacific region that said they were at risk for corruption and bribery, according to an earlier Kroll study
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250