Lance Armstrong doping scandal sparks litigation
On Thursday, cyclist Lance Armstrong finally admitted to using performance-enhancing drugs, confirming allegations that have been swirling for years.
January 18, 2013 at 06:36 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
On Thursday, cyclist Lance Armstrong finally admitted to using performance-enhancing drugs, confirming allegations that have been swirling for years.
The confession has certainly had professional ramifications for the cyclist, who resigned from the board of his Livestrong cancer charity, lost sponsorship deals and was stripped of his Tour de France victories and his 2000 Olympic bronze medal in the wake of the scandal. But legal ramifications are coming as well, as companies, individuals and even the U.S. government are said to be mulling lawsuits against Armstrong.
One such company, SCA Promotions, has threatened to take legal action if Armstrong does not return $12 million in bonus money that it gave him following his Tour de France victories. Tailwind Sports, which owned Armstrong's U.S. Postal team, pledged a $5 million bonus to Armstrong if he won his sixth title. The company took out insurance with SCA Promotions to cover the cost, but SCA refused to pay up when Armstrong won, citing doping allegations against the cyclist. Armstrong eventually won a 2006 settlement with the insurance company that included the bonus, interest and attorney fees.
The disgraced athlete could also be in trouble with the U.S. Department of Justice, which is considering joining a whistleblower suit against Armstrong, the Wall Street Journal reported. Armstrong's former teammate, Floyd Landis, filed the suit in 2010, claiming that Armstrong defrauded the U.S. government by taking $30.6 million in sponsorship money from the U.S. Postal Service between 2001 and 2004. The team's contract with the Postal Service reportedly said that the agreement would be rendered invalid if any riders or team personnel attracted negative publicity due to banned substances.
And Armstrong is already facing a $1.5 million lawsuit courtesy of a British newspaper that paid him nearly half-a-million dollars to settle a libel suit in 2006. The cyclist sued the Sunday Times after the Rupert Murdoch-owned paper reprinted allegations that he had taken performance-enhancing drugs.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more sports-related scandals on InsideCounsel, see:
Sportswear company sues International Cycling Union over Armstrong scandal
Top sports lawyer excels as GC of Brooklyn Nets, Barclays Center
Guitarist says NBA star Kevin Durant stole his “Durantula” nickname
FDIC targets ex-Chicago Bears QB in bank suit
New York Mets settle with Madoff victims for $162 million
Michael Jordan sues Chinese company for using his name
Betting on March Madness may be illegal
NFL bounty programs could land teams in court
On Thursday, cyclist Lance Armstrong finally admitted to using performance-enhancing drugs, confirming allegations that have been swirling for years.
The confession has certainly had professional ramifications for the cyclist, who resigned from the board of his Livestrong cancer charity, lost sponsorship deals and was stripped of his Tour de France victories and his 2000 Olympic bronze medal in the wake of the scandal. But legal ramifications are coming as well, as companies, individuals and even the U.S. government are said to be mulling lawsuits against Armstrong.
One such company, SCA Promotions, has threatened to take legal action if Armstrong does not return $12 million in bonus money that it gave him following his Tour de France victories. Tailwind Sports, which owned Armstrong's U.S. Postal team, pledged a $5 million bonus to Armstrong if he won his sixth title. The company took out insurance with SCA Promotions to cover the cost, but SCA refused to pay up when Armstrong won, citing doping allegations against the cyclist. Armstrong eventually won a 2006 settlement with the insurance company that included the bonus, interest and attorney fees.
The disgraced athlete could also be in trouble with the U.S. Department of Justice, which is considering joining a whistleblower suit against Armstrong, the Wall Street Journal reported. Armstrong's former teammate, Floyd Landis, filed the suit in 2010, claiming that Armstrong defrauded the U.S. government by taking $30.6 million in sponsorship money from the U.S. Postal Service between 2001 and 2004. The team's contract with the Postal Service reportedly said that the agreement would be rendered invalid if any riders or team personnel attracted negative publicity due to banned substances.
And Armstrong is already facing a $1.5 million lawsuit courtesy of a British newspaper that paid him nearly half-a-million dollars to settle a libel suit in 2006. The cyclist sued the Sunday Times after the Rupert Murdoch-owned paper reprinted allegations that he had taken performance-enhancing drugs.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more sports-related scandals on InsideCounsel, see:
Sportswear company sues International Cycling Union over Armstrong scandal
Top sports lawyer excels as GC of Brooklyn Nets,
Guitarist says NBA star Kevin Durant stole his “Durantula” nickname
FDIC targets ex-Chicago Bears QB in bank suit
Michael Jordan sues Chinese company for using his name
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Trending Stories
- 1NBA Players Association Finds Its New GC in Warriors Front Office
- 2Prenuptial Agreement Spousal Support Waivers: Proceed With Caution
- 3DC Circuit Keeps Docs in Judge Newman's Misconduct Proceedings Sealed
- 4Litigators of the Week: US Soccer and MLS Fend Off Claims They Conspired to Scuttle Rival League’s Prospect
- 5Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
