Dairy co-op will pay $158.6 million in antitrust settlement
The two parties have finally come to an agreementending the last stage of the litigation that dates back four years.
January 23, 2013 at 06:01 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The two parties have finally come to an agreement—ending the last stage of the litigation that dates back four years. The Dairy Farmers of America (DFA), the milk industry's marketing cooperative, agreed yesterday to pay $158.6 million to settle antitrust accusations. And just in the nick of time—the case was set to go to trial yesterday.
About 7,000 dairy farmers in 14 states sued the co-op in 2009, claiming the organization conspired to fix the price of milk in the southeastern U.S. Combined with other settlements involved in this litigation, the dairy farmers will receive about $300 million.
As part of the agreement, DFA will change its business practices in the Southeast, and will be “taking steps to increase raw milk prices, removing cancellation penalties on certain … supply agreements with bottling plants and not entering into new supply agreements,” the co-op said in a statement. It will also provide more disclosure about pricing and put some business practices up for membership vote.
Robert G. Abrams, partner at BakerHostetler and counsel for the plaintiffs, believes the settlement will have an impact. “The Southeast milk market has been reformed to the benefit of dairy farmers,” he said in a statement.
Despite admitting no wrongdoing, the DFA said that it has worked diligently to “put old issues behind” it. “This outcome positions DFA to fulfill a commitment to our members to resolve pending litigation, to remove a source of distraction for our leadership and to avoid additional legal fees,” the co-op's CEO, Rick Smith, said in a statement.
Read other recent InsideCounsel antitrust stories:
Private antitrust suits up in 2012
Google/FTC deal will affect future technology patent disputes
DOJ antitrust division collects record-breaking fines in 2012
Regulators sue NY tour buses for alleged monopoly
Retailers appeal $7.2 billion Visa/Mastercard settlement
Most-favored-nation clauses attract antitrust scrutiny
The two parties have finally come to an agreement—ending the last stage of the litigation that dates back four years. The
About 7,000 dairy farmers in 14 states sued the co-op in 2009, claiming the organization conspired to fix the price of milk in the southeastern U.S. Combined with other settlements involved in this litigation, the dairy farmers will receive about $300 million.
As part of the agreement, DFA will change its business practices in the Southeast, and will be “taking steps to increase raw milk prices, removing cancellation penalties on certain … supply agreements with bottling plants and not entering into new supply agreements,” the co-op said in a statement. It will also provide more disclosure about pricing and put some business practices up for membership vote.
Robert G. Abrams, partner at BakerHostetler and counsel for the plaintiffs, believes the settlement will have an impact. “The Southeast milk market has been reformed to the benefit of dairy farmers,” he said in a statement.
Despite admitting no wrongdoing, the DFA said that it has worked diligently to “put old issues behind” it. “This outcome positions DFA to fulfill a commitment to our members to resolve pending litigation, to remove a source of distraction for our leadership and to avoid additional legal fees,” the co-op's CEO, Rick Smith, said in a statement.
Read other recent InsideCounsel antitrust stories:
Private antitrust suits up in 2012
DOJ antitrust division collects record-breaking fines in 2012
Regulators sue NY tour buses for alleged monopoly
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
