Diving into 2013, we must accept change
A country divided means change is surely on the horizon for companies
January 27, 2013 at 07:00 PM
2 minute read
No one likes change. Well, very few people do. And those who do only like it—or more accurately, tolerate it better than most—because they have trained themselves over the course of years to accept it, welcome it and sometimes embrace it.
On a larger scale, some of the events of last year have forced us to look change in the eye and either accept what's to come or … brace ourselves for whatever unpleasantness it brings. First, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the first national health care program our country has ever seen. The controversial Obamacare law means big decisions for both businesses and employees and, in some cases, major overhauls to existing benefits plans. Secondly, for the first time in history, a sitting U.S. president came out in support of gay marriage. Then, the Supreme Court jumped into the debate—agreeing to weigh in on two of the five cases seeking marriage equality that hit its desk. The high court will hear arguments for these cases next month. And finally, tragedies such as the Colorado theater shooting, the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, the Oregon mall shooting and countless other violent crimes across the country have opened up the debate over gun control—and a heated debate it is.
On all three of these issues, it's an understatement to say that the country is divided. But the reality is, one of the sides on each issue is going to walk away disappointed—in fact, in the case of Obamacare, that has already happened.
Although every year brings new and sometimes exciting—but also sometimes unwelcome—changes, 2013 may shape up to be more epic than past years. Whether you're grappling with one of the above-mentioned hot topics, your personal life takes an unexpected turn or your company faces an unprecedented crisis that requires quick, competent management (this month's cover story offers advice on crisis management—see Taming the Beast), something—major or minor—is likely to make you take pause and resist. In most cases, it's human nature.
But as we dive head first into 2013 and all it has to offer, let's all do our best to accept change, welcome change and even embrace the experience to learn.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFinancial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250