Government sues Renco Group for avoiding pension obligations to bankrupt steel company
The U.S. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. (PBGC) is suing Renco Group Inc., a private holding company, for allegedly avoiding paying the pension plans of bankrupt steel company RG Steel, in which Renco Group had a controlling interest.
January 29, 2013 at 06:14 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The U.S. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. (PBGC) is suing Renco Group Inc., a private holding company, for allegedly avoiding paying the pension plans of bankrupt steel company RG Steel, in which Renco Group had a controlling interest.
Specifically, PBGC accuses Renco Group of trying to reduce its ownership in RG Steel to keep it from having to fulfill RG Steel's pension obligations. Before RG Steel filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in May 2012, Renco Group sold 24.5 percent of its ownership to an affiliate of Cerberus Capital Management, an investment firm.
PBGC is seeking $97 million in damages, to cover the unfunded plan benefit liabilities for 1,350 people, termination premiums and minimum funding contributions.
Read more at Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of pensions, see below:
NY pension fund sues Qualcomm over political spending
Judge rejects attempt to stop Verizon's $7.5 billion pension transfer
Delaware judge reprimands two plaintiffs in Wal-Mart bribery case
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute read
Baker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1Chicago Cubs' IP Claim to Continue Against Wrigley View Rooftop, Judge Rules
- 2Fulton DA Seeks to Overturn Her Disqualification From Trump Georgia Election Case
- 3The FTC’s Noncompete Rule Is Likely Dead
- 4COVID-19 Vaccine Suit Against United Airlines Hangs on Right-to-Sue Letter Date
- 5People in the News—Jan. 10, 2025—Lamb McErlane, Saxton & Stump
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
