2nd Circuit sides with Ralph Lauren in polo player logo fight
The 2nd Circuit on Monday gave a victory to Ralph Lauren Corp. in the fashion companys long-running legal battle with the U.S. Polo Association (USPA), ruling that the latter cannot use a double horseman logo on its fragrances because it too closely resembles Ralph Laurens trademarks.
February 12, 2013 at 06:08 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The 2nd Circuit on Monday gave a victory to Ralph Lauren Corp. in the fashion company's long-running legal battle with the U.S. Polo Association (USPA), ruling that the latter cannot use a “double horseman” logo on its fragrances because it too closely resembles Ralph Lauren's trademarks.
In 1984, the USPA won the right to use a polo player logo on its retail goods, as long as the image was not likely to cause confusion with Ralph Lauren, which has featured its own famous polo player image on fragrances since 1978.
Then, in 2006, a Manhattan federal jury ruled that the USPA's use of the logo on apparel was not infringing, provided that it was either an outline—as opposed to a solid image—or was accompanied by the letters “U.S.P.A.” The 2nd Circuit later upheld that ruling.
But a three-judge panel of the court wasn't as sympathetic to USPA this week, when it rejected the polo association's request for declaratory judgment that it could use the double horseman image on its men's fragrance, which it introduced in 2009.
“The fact that USPA was authorized to use its Double Horseman logo in one industry—apparel—does not necessarily mean that it acted with good faith in using the same marks here at issue in a different industry—men's fragrances,” the court wrote in its opinion.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the fashion industry, see:
The 2nd Circuit on Monday gave a victory to Ralph Lauren Corp. in the fashion company's long-running legal battle with the U.S. Polo Association (USPA), ruling that the latter cannot use a “double horseman” logo on its fragrances because it too closely resembles Ralph Lauren's trademarks.
In 1984, the USPA won the right to use a polo player logo on its retail goods, as long as the image was not likely to cause confusion with Ralph Lauren, which has featured its own famous polo player image on fragrances since 1978.
Then, in 2006, a Manhattan federal jury ruled that the USPA's use of the logo on apparel was not infringing, provided that it was either an outline—as opposed to a solid image—or was accompanied by the letters “U.S.P.A.” The 2nd Circuit later upheld that ruling.
But a three-judge panel of the court wasn't as sympathetic to USPA this week, when it rejected the polo association's request for declaratory judgment that it could use the double horseman image on its men's fragrance, which it introduced in 2009.
“The fact that USPA was authorized to use its Double Horseman logo in one industry—apparel—does not necessarily mean that it acted with good faith in using the same marks here at issue in a different industry—men's fragrances,” the court wrote in its opinion.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the fashion industry, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoogle Fails to Secure Long-Term Stay of Order Requiring It to Open App Store to Rivals
Rates Will Go Up (Again), But Here's Why Profitability Might Not Be Maximized
4 minute readFinancial Services Has a Trust Problem. Can GCs Help Right the Ship?
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250