Collaborating with outside counsel: Working together to find efficiencies
The good news for corporate counsel is that their budgets are rising.
February 20, 2013 at 02:46 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The good news for corporate counsel is that their budgets are rising. In fact, the median legal department budget increased by 10.7 percent in 2011, according to Corporate Executive Board. This trend appears to give GCs more options and more flexibility when it comes to outsourcing important tasks to outside counsel.
Yet budgets are not infinite. Today, savvy GCs are collaborating more closely with outside counsel to make sure that projects are as streamlined as possible and that everyone is collaborating to find efficiencies—while still maintaining the highest standards for due diligence.
These efforts include leveraging new technologies to help make workflow processes more efficient. Traditionally manual, paper-based processes need to be automated to help firms manage their transactional work. At many law firms today, reduced staffing, increased demands from clients and the shifting roles of attorneys and paralegals are prompting a drive to do more with less.
GCs can find a win-win situation by working with law firms that have invested to streamline their operations and are using technology to simplify workflows and reduce duplicative processes such as manual rekeying of information. These investments also include the tools and training to make associates more efficient. Today's associates can often be found doing the work of paralegals—and vice versa. Automating manual tasks can help all of them handle larger and unfamiliar workloads—and take on more of the strategic work clients require.
Today, more than ever, GCs need accuracy and efficiency when it comes to the due diligence process. For example, paralegals can spend an estimated two to 50 hours per transaction rekeying and reorganizing lien search results into charts for attorneys. With accuracy and speed as competing priorities, a simple data-entry mistake can have expensive repercussions. Fortunately, there are technology solutions available to law firms to help them deliver better price value—and accuracy—to their corporate clients.
Where associates and paralegals once had to manually create spreadsheets to organize public record search results for review and analysis, this tedious task can now be done with web-based software. Such software provides associates and paralegals with quick, comprehensive and accurate chart summaries of public record search results with collateral descriptions, links to document images and other time-saving features. These solutions can even auto-populate chart content from the public record into a chart summary, which reduces manual re-keying and decreases errors. Another valuable function of this software is the ability to automate manual processes, such as follow-up steps like filing UCC-3s, to increase accuracy and improve time savings. Other features found in best-of-breed applications include organizational and workflow tools to keep due diligence processes running smoothly.
Today's software is easier than ever to use, enabling associates and paralegals with varying degrees of technology expertise to perform their jobs better. These applications also free up paralegals to do other, more valuable, work—a win-win-win for the employees, their firms and the GCs who work with them.
With so much pressure on the GC's office today, the last thing legal departments need to worry about is managing the potential costs and increased complexity of projects such as outsourced lien searches. By choosing the right outside counsel that has, in turn, chosen the right people and right technology to streamline the job, the general counsel can rest a bit easier knowing that all the key risks are being managed appropriately.
The good news for corporate counsel is that their budgets are rising. In fact, the median legal department budget increased by 10.7 percent in 2011, according to Corporate Executive Board. This trend appears to give GCs more options and more flexibility when it comes to outsourcing important tasks to outside counsel.
Yet budgets are not infinite. Today, savvy GCs are collaborating more closely with outside counsel to make sure that projects are as streamlined as possible and that everyone is collaborating to find efficiencies—while still maintaining the highest standards for due diligence.
These efforts include leveraging new technologies to help make workflow processes more efficient. Traditionally manual, paper-based processes need to be automated to help firms manage their transactional work. At many law firms today, reduced staffing, increased demands from clients and the shifting roles of attorneys and paralegals are prompting a drive to do more with less.
GCs can find a win-win situation by working with law firms that have invested to streamline their operations and are using technology to simplify workflows and reduce duplicative processes such as manual rekeying of information. These investments also include the tools and training to make associates more efficient. Today's associates can often be found doing the work of paralegals—and vice versa. Automating manual tasks can help all of them handle larger and unfamiliar workloads—and take on more of the strategic work clients require.
Today, more than ever, GCs need accuracy and efficiency when it comes to the due diligence process. For example, paralegals can spend an estimated two to 50 hours per transaction rekeying and reorganizing lien search results into charts for attorneys. With accuracy and speed as competing priorities, a simple data-entry mistake can have expensive repercussions. Fortunately, there are technology solutions available to law firms to help them deliver better price value—and accuracy—to their corporate clients.
Where associates and paralegals once had to manually create spreadsheets to organize public record search results for review and analysis, this tedious task can now be done with web-based software. Such software provides associates and paralegals with quick, comprehensive and accurate chart summaries of public record search results with collateral descriptions, links to document images and other time-saving features. These solutions can even auto-populate chart content from the public record into a chart summary, which reduces manual re-keying and decreases errors. Another valuable function of this software is the ability to automate manual processes, such as follow-up steps like filing UCC-3s, to increase accuracy and improve time savings. Other features found in best-of-breed applications include organizational and workflow tools to keep due diligence processes running smoothly.
Today's software is easier than ever to use, enabling associates and paralegals with varying degrees of technology expertise to perform their jobs better. These applications also free up paralegals to do other, more valuable, work—a win-win-win for the employees, their firms and the GCs who work with them.
With so much pressure on the GC's office today, the last thing legal departments need to worry about is managing the potential costs and increased complexity of projects such as outsourced lien searches. By choosing the right outside counsel that has, in turn, chosen the right people and right technology to streamline the job, the general counsel can rest a bit easier knowing that all the key risks are being managed appropriately.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute readLegal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250