Jury orders Dow Chemical to pay $400 million for price-fixing
Dow Chemical Co. must pay $400 million to a class of purchasers after a federal jury ruled Wednesday that the company conspired to fix prices of the chemical urethane.
February 21, 2013 at 06:53 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Dow Chemical Co. must pay $400 million to a class of purchasers after a federal jury ruled Wednesday that the company conspired to fix prices of the chemical urethane.
Urethane is used to manufacture everything from cars to packaging to furniture. In 2005, a group of more than 60 urethane purchasers filed a class-action lawsuit claiming that Dow, Huntsman International, Lyondell Chemical Co., Bayer AG and BASF SE joined forces to set prices of the chemical for five years beginning in 1999.
Dow's co-defendants agreed to settle the case for more than $139 million collectively, leaving the Michigan-based chemical giant as the last holdout. This week, a Kansas City, Kan. jury sided with the plaintiffs, although it did not find Dow liable for the entire five years of the conspiracy.
The $400 million verdict is considerably less than the $1.125 billion in damages that plaintiffs originally sought. But the victorious purchasers could still get more than $1 billion if a judge approves the jury's verdict, since federal antitrust law allows the damages to be tripled.
Dow, meanwhile, continues to deny all allegations of wrongdoing, and will seek to have the suit dismissed in a post-trial motion, according to Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of alleged price-fixing schemes, see:
Toshiba will pay $87 million for price fixing
9th Circuit revives dairy farmers' price-fixing suit
Retailers appeal $7.2 billion Visa/MasterCard settlement
Illinois sues Samsung, LG and other electronics companies for price-fixing
SuperConference Keynote Panel offers inside look at the story behind “The Informant”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Who Is Nicholas J. Ganjei? His Rise to Top Lawyer
- 2Delaware Supreme Court Names Civil Litigator to Serve as New Chief Disciplinary Counsel
- 3Inside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
- 4Fresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
- 5Ex-Kline & Specter Associate Drops Lawsuit Against the Firm
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250