Law firm profits increased in 2012, K&L Gates posts detailed financial report
U.S. law firms saw an increase in revenue and profits in 2012, according to an early look by Thomson Reuters at a survey by The American Lawyer.
February 22, 2013 at 06:44 AM
20 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
U.S. law firms saw an increase in revenue and profits in 2012, according to an early look by Thomson Reuters at a survey by The American Lawyer. Forty-five out of 200 law firms surveyed have reported financials so far, and that data shows that the average revenue increase for firms was 6 percent, compared with 4.4 percent in 2011.
Bracewell & Giuliani in Houston saw the most growth in 2012, with a 42.2 percent increase in profits per partner, and Shook Hardy & Bacon in Kansas City saw the largest decline—a 16 percent decrease in profits per partner.
If you're jonesing for an in-depth look at a firm's money matters, K&L Gates has posted the full details of its 2012 finances on its website. It included numbers that most firms keep to themselves, such as its bank debt ($0) and how much partner capital it needed on hand in 2012 ($173.7 million).
K&L Gates chairman Peter Kalis said that posting the numbers was meant to increase transparency in the legal field. The Wall Street Journal reports that the American Lawyer numbers have been criticized for inaccuracy. For example, in 2011, the now-infamously bankrupt firm Dewey & LeBoeuf reported revenues of $935 million when in fact they were around 16 percent lower, at $780 million.
“In these times, opacity is not our friend,” Kalis told the WSJ. “I was embarrassed to be part of the same profession and industry as Dewey & LeBoeuf.”
For more law firm news on InsideCounsel, see below:
U.S. law firms saw an increase in revenue and profits in 2012, according to an early look by Thomson Reuters at a survey by The American Lawyer. Forty-five out of 200 law firms surveyed have reported financials so far, and that data shows that the average revenue increase for firms was 6 percent, compared with 4.4 percent in 2011.
If you're jonesing for an in-depth look at a firm's money matters,
“In these times, opacity is not our friend,” Kalis told the WSJ. “I was embarrassed to be part of the same profession and industry as
For more law firm news on InsideCounsel, see below:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
GCs Jettisoning Zero-Based Budgeting in Quest to Be Nimble, More Efficient
3 minute readFoley & Lardner Litigator Joins Brewers Roster as Legal Chief
Trending Stories
- 1Commentary: James Madicon, Meet Matt Gaetz
- 2The Narcissist’s Dilemma: Balancing Power and Inadequacy in Family Law
- 3Leopard Solutions Launches AI Navigator, a Gen AI Search, Data Extraction Tool
- 4Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 5Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250