Latham & Watkins, Pro Bono Institute provide overview of international pro bono landscape
Report includes details about legal aid programs, unmet legal needs, practice rules and more
February 25, 2013 at 07:00 PM
3 minute read
A new pro bono report literally puts the world at in-house counsel's fingertips.
The 2012 edition of Latham & Watkins' Survey of Pro Bono Practices and Opportunities in Select Jurisdictions, conducted in conjunction with the Pro Bono Institute (PBI), provides an overview of the legal landscape in dozens of countries around the globe, including details about local legal aid programs, unmet legal needs, the cultural perception of pro bono and rules about engaging in pro bono work. The report serves as a guide for law firms, nongovernmental organizations, legal departments and other interested parties that want to pursue international pro bono projects.
Latham & Watkins and PBI started producing the report in 2005. The first version surveyed 11 jurisdictions, most of them located in Europe.
“Until the survey, there was really no resource for people who were looking to engage in pro bono in jurisdictions outside of their core home countries,” says Wendy Atrokhov, Latham & Watkins' public service counsel.
Assembling the 376-page 2012 report was nearly a five-month process.
“This past year, we undertook the most ambitious update yet,” Atrokhov says. “We had more than 100 attorneys and staff from across all of our 30 offices engaged. We were able to expand the survey to nearly double the previous edition so that it now covers more than 70 jurisdictions in North and South America, Europe, Asia, Africa and the Middle East.”
The 2012 report underscores notable gaps in coverage in state-provided legal services within many jurisdictions. “In some jurisdictions, the services are not meeting the demand among everyone who's eligible, or they exclude certain portions of the population from eligibility,” Atrokhov says. “Immigrants, refugees and asylum-seekers may not be entitled to legal aid.”
The report also educates in-house counsel about possible barriers in pursuing international pro bono work. “In some countries, practice rules make it virtually impossible for in-house counsel to undertake pro bono work, as they are not treated as fully practicing lawyers,” says Esther Lardent, president and CEO of PBI. “In addition, in some parts of the world—the European Union, for example—in-house counsel do not have an attorney-client privilege, or that privilege is limited, so that client confidences are not protected, and building trust with pro bono clients may be impaired.”
Lardent says the report gives inside counsel “the tools to advocate for changes in rules and processes that inhibit in-house pro bono service.”
Additionally, the report helps companies grow their business opportunities. “Many companies are focused on expanding their customer base and growing revenues in developing nations,” Lardent says. “To help them do so, their legal departments must be familiar with legal practice and procedure, both written and unwritten, in those nations. Pro bono offers an important vehicle to gain that understanding, to develop contacts with key stakeholders and regulators, and to create goodwill.”
The 2012 survey was the first that contained input from in-house counsel. Latham & Watkins and PBI plan to continue working with in-house counsel to identify more pro bono-related considerations that are unique to them in jurisdictions around the world.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
How Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readRepublican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
4 minute readFTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250