Rajat Gupta must repay Goldman Sachs $6.22 million in legal costs
Rajat Guptas sizeable net worth will be somewhat diminished after a judge ruled Monday that the former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. director must repay the bank more than $6 million in legal fees connected with his insider trading case.
February 26, 2013 at 06:33 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Rajat Gupta's sizeable net worth will be somewhat diminished after a judge ruled Monday that the former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. director must repay the bank more than $6 million in legal fees connected with his insider trading case.
Last October, Gupta was sentenced to two years in prison for sharing corporate secrets with former hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam. (A year earlier, Rajaratnam received an 11-year sentence for his part in the scheme.)
Goldman argued that under the federal Mandatory Victims Restitution Act, it was entitled to repayment of the money it paid to Sullivan & Cromwell for an internal investigation and other legal fees connected with Gupta's case.
Judge Jed Rakoff largely agreed and awarded Goldman 90 percent of the restitution it asked for, including costs related to a Securities and Exchange Commission case against Gupta and the criminal case against Raj Rajaratnam. According to Rakoff, who oversaw Gupta's criminal trial, Goldman's expenses were a “necessary, direct and foreseeable result of the investigation and prosecution of Gupta's offense of conviction.”
Rakoff did not award Goldman the full $6.91 million that it initially sought, however, because he found that some of the costs dealt with depositions in civil cases that occurred after the criminal conviction. He also said that Goldman occasionally assigned too many attorneys to the case.
Both Gupta and Rajaratnam are appealing their insider trading convictions. Goldman is still responsible for Gupta's legal fees until his appeal is complete; as part of its bylaws, the bank must cover the legal costs of its top directors and officers. If a court upholds Gupta's conviction, however, he will have to reimburse his former employer for these remaining fees, as part of a deal he reached before his trial, the New York Times reports.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of Gupta's trial, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250