“Girls Gone Wild” files for bankruptcy
They say sex sells, but it apparently wasnt enough to keep the company behind Girls Gone Wild out of bankruptcy.
March 01, 2013 at 06:20 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
They say sex sells, but it apparently wasn't enough to keep the company behind “Girls Gone Wild” out of bankruptcy.
GGW Brands, which is famous for its racy video series in which young women drink and dance in various states of undress, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Wednesday. The company says the decision isn't indicative of its financial state, but rather the result of several costly legal battles.
“The company Girls Gone Wild remains strong as a company and strong financially,” the company said in a statement Thursday. “The only reason Girls Gone Wild has elected to file for this reorganization is to restructure its frivolous and burdensome legal affairs.”
Chief among those affairs is a $10 million debt that the company owes casino mogul Steve Wynn. Last year, “Girls Gone Wild” founder Joe Francis was ordered to pay Wynn $40 million for defamation and emotional distress, after he falsely told a court that Wynn threatened to kill him and bury him in the desert over a $2 million gambling debt. A judge later reduced the award to $19 million.
The company also owes more than $5 million to Tamara Favazza, a Missouri woman who won her own lawsuit against Francis-owned Mantra Films Inc. and MRA Holdings LLC in April 2012. Favazza claimed that in 2005, as a 20-year-old college student, she was dancing at a St. Louis, Mo. club when a “Girls Gone Wild” employee lifted up her tank top and filmed her breasts for one of the company's videos.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more coverage of the adult entertainment industry, see:
Universal Studios sues porn company for “Fifty Shades of Gray” copyright infringement
Woman seeks class action status in lawsuit against 5 porn companies
Company applies for .sex, .porn and .adult domain names
Porn site points finger at Megaupload
They say sex sells, but it apparently wasn't enough to keep the company behind “Girls Gone Wild” out of bankruptcy.
GGW Brands, which is famous for its racy video series in which young women drink and dance in various states of undress, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Wednesday. The company says the decision isn't indicative of its financial state, but rather the result of several costly legal battles.
“The company Girls Gone Wild remains strong as a company and strong financially,” the company said in a statement Thursday. “The only reason Girls Gone Wild has elected to file for this reorganization is to restructure its frivolous and burdensome legal affairs.”
Chief among those affairs is a $10 million debt that the company owes casino mogul Steve Wynn. Last year, “Girls Gone Wild” founder Joe Francis was ordered to pay Wynn $40 million for defamation and emotional distress, after he falsely told a court that Wynn threatened to kill him and bury him in the desert over a $2 million gambling debt. A judge later reduced the award to $19 million.
The company also owes more than $5 million to Tamara Favazza, a Missouri woman who won her own lawsuit against Francis-owned Mantra Films Inc. and MRA Holdings LLC in April 2012. Favazza claimed that in 2005, as a 20-year-old college student, she was dancing at a St. Louis, Mo. club when a “Girls Gone Wild” employee lifted up her tank top and filmed her breasts for one of the company's videos.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more coverage of the adult entertainment industry, see:
Universal Studios sues porn company for “Fifty Shades of Gray” copyright infringement
Woman seeks class action status in lawsuit against 5 porn companies
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Meta Hires Litigation Strategy Chief, Tapping King & Spalding Partner Who Was Senior DOJ Official in First Trump Term
Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
