FDA calorie labeling requirements spark controversy
Obamacare has caused a lot of controversy, and the uproar isnt limited to the healthcare arena.
March 13, 2013 at 07:45 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Obamacare has caused a lot of controversy, and the uproar isn't limited to the healthcare arena. The supermarket industry is up in arms about a proposed section of the 2010 act that could require stores to label many food items prepared in-store, such as bakery items, salad bar offerings and deli products.
Under the proposed law, restaurants and “similar food establishments” with 20 or more locations would be required to post calorie counts for many items that aren't prepackaged and labeled. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has suggested in draft regulations that “similar food establishments” include supermarkets that devote more than half of their floor space to selling food items.
Those stores, however, contend that only a small percentage of their sales come from deli stations, bakeries and the like, the Wall Street Journal reports. Some industry experts also note that the cost of complying with the proposed FDA regulations—which would require supermarkets to provide the agency with detailed nutritional information about each ingredient that goes into their prepared foods—could increase prices for consumers.
FDA officials still haven't issued final regulations, and agency commissioner Margaret Hamburg recently told the Associated Press that “[the agency has] worked very hard to sort of figure out what really makes sense and also what is implementable.”
For more food labeling stories on InsideCounsel, see:
Obamacare has caused a lot of controversy, and the uproar isn't limited to the healthcare arena. The supermarket industry is up in arms about a proposed section of the 2010 act that could require stores to label many food items prepared in-store, such as bakery items, salad bar offerings and deli products.
Under the proposed law, restaurants and “similar food establishments” with 20 or more locations would be required to post calorie counts for many items that aren't prepackaged and labeled. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has suggested in draft regulations that “similar food establishments” include supermarkets that devote more than half of their floor space to selling food items.
Those stores, however, contend that only a small percentage of their sales come from deli stations, bakeries and the like, the Wall Street Journal reports. Some industry experts also note that the cost of complying with the proposed FDA regulations—which would require supermarkets to provide the agency with detailed nutritional information about each ingredient that goes into their prepared foods—could increase prices for consumers.
FDA officials still haven't issued final regulations, and agency commissioner Margaret Hamburg recently told
For more food labeling stories on InsideCounsel, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSenators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anticompetitive Practices, Fees
Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
Trump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readFTC Sues Cash-Advance Fintech Dave, Says It Deceives the 'Financially Vulnerable'
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250