Staffing update for the FTC and DOJ
The antitrust agencies recently saw two changes in leadership.
March 25, 2013 at 08:00 PM
2 minute read
To learn about how the antitrust agencies are challenging mergers and acquisitions, see our April cover story.
The antitrust agencies recently saw two changes in leadership.
Bill Baer was confirmed Dec. 30, 2012, as assistant attorney general for the Department of Justice's (DOJ) Antitrust Division. Previously Baer was in private practice and also had several stints at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), including one as director of the Bureau of Competition from 1995 to 1999.
Claudia Higgins, who spent two decades at the FTC, most recently as assistant director for regional litigation, worked there with Baer and says he knows how to balance business with law.
“Bill Baer is someone who really does understand how to litigate, and he's somebody who understands the business side of things,” says Higgins, now a partner at Kaye Scholer. “Some might say that because he filed two cases in his first month it means that he's going to be a gangbuster at the DOJ, but it's going to be fairly balanced. He does come with really strong credentials in understanding both sides of the fence.”
At the FTC, Edith Ramirez took over from Jon Leibowitz as chairman in March. Leibowitz left on a high note in the wake of a Supreme Court victory and the conclusion of the agency's Google Inc. investigation.
Robby Robertson, former chief trial counsel for the FTC's Bureau of Competition and now a partner at Hogan Lovells, says that though the DOJ went through a period of risk aversion, the FTC has not operated that way, at least not since Tim Muris became chairman in 2001. Recent FTC successes in merger enforcement came after a string of losses and reflect the agency's persistence, Robertson says.
“Across the whole agency, not just on the competition side but on the consumer protection side, too, they take on what they believe is the right case, and they do it no matter what the risk is,” he says. “It's something that I would expect Edith Ramirez to continue—she's a bright lawyer who is not shy and is not afraid to take on risk.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
2024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
Financial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
Trending Stories
- 1‘Not a Kindergarten Teacher’: Judge Blasts Keller Postman, Jenner & Block in Mass Arb Dispute
- 2A&O Shearman, Hogan Lovells and the Stories That Shaped Africa This Year
- 3Borden Ladner Gervais Cyber Expert Warns of AI-Boosted Ransomware Attacks
- 4Phila. Judge Upholds $68.5M Verdict Over Construction Worker's Death
- 5Biden Vetoes Bill to Create More Federal Judgeships
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250