GCs weigh in on work-life balance, diversity at inaugural New Girls’ Network event
Several prominent general counsel were among those weighing in on diversity, leadership and work-life balance at an event hosted by the New Girls Network.
April 05, 2013 at 09:40 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Several prominent general counsel were among those weighing in on diversity, leadership and work-life balance at an event hosted by the New Girls' Network, an organization that aims to turn social science into real-life strategies for women looking to climb the corporate ladder.
In two separate discussions, panelists discussed the above topics, as well as the ways in which women—particularly mothers—still face bias in the workplace. Professor Joan Williams, a founding director of the Center for WorkLife Law, noted that female employees are often forced to repeatedly prove their worth, while their male counterparts are judged on potential, and that many women struggle to balance assertiveness with likeability in the workplace.
The absence of flexible leave time is also an ongoing problem for both men and women, said Williams, noting that male employees who take parental leave frequently see their professional advancement stall.
But some companies are taking steps to correct these imbalances. New York Public Library General Counsel Michele Coleman Mayes recounted the measures that she took to minimize bias when doling out promotions, raises or bonuses in her former role as GC of Allstate Insurance Co.
Mayes' team, assuming that people have certain implicit biases, came up with “rules of engagement” that required those in charge of hiring or compensation decisions to look at an employee's measurable, recent performance, instead of allowing long-past mistakes or stereotypes to enter into the equation.
Another GC weighing in on the issues of leadership and women's advancement was Pfizer Inc.'s top lawyer, Amy Schulman, who noted that women are often too unwilling to use the goodwill that they have built up with colleagues or supervisors. “Don't be afraid to spend some of your political capital,” she advised.
In the end, Schulman said, an excellent leader—male or female—is someone who is motivated by passion, and who puts the strength of the business before their own individual advancement. “The further up you go, the less it is about you and the more it is about the organization,” she said.
Learn more about the New Girls' Network here.
For more career coverage on InsideCounsel, see:
Several prominent general counsel were among those weighing in on diversity, leadership and work-life balance at an event hosted by the New Girls' Network, an organization that aims to turn social science into real-life strategies for women looking to climb the corporate ladder.
In two separate discussions, panelists discussed the above topics, as well as the ways in which women—particularly mothers—still face bias in the workplace. Professor Joan Williams, a founding director of the Center for WorkLife Law, noted that female employees are often forced to repeatedly prove their worth, while their male counterparts are judged on potential, and that many women struggle to balance assertiveness with likeability in the workplace.
The absence of flexible leave time is also an ongoing problem for both men and women, said Williams, noting that male employees who take parental leave frequently see their professional advancement stall.
But some companies are taking steps to correct these imbalances.
Mayes' team, assuming that people have certain implicit biases, came up with “rules of engagement” that required those in charge of hiring or compensation decisions to look at an employee's measurable, recent performance, instead of allowing long-past mistakes or stereotypes to enter into the equation.
Another GC weighing in on the issues of leadership and women's advancement was
In the end, Schulman said, an excellent leader—male or female—is someone who is motivated by passion, and who puts the strength of the business before their own individual advancement. “The further up you go, the less it is about you and the more it is about the organization,” she said.
Learn more about the New Girls' Network here.
For more career coverage on InsideCounsel, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBeyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Step 1 for Successful Negotiators: Believe in Yourself
Deluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250