GCs weigh in on work-life balance, diversity at inaugural New Girls’ Network event
Several prominent general counsel were among those weighing in on diversity, leadership and work-life balance at an event hosted by the New Girls Network.
April 05, 2013 at 09:40 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Several prominent general counsel were among those weighing in on diversity, leadership and work-life balance at an event hosted by the New Girls' Network, an organization that aims to turn social science into real-life strategies for women looking to climb the corporate ladder.
In two separate discussions, panelists discussed the above topics, as well as the ways in which women—particularly mothers—still face bias in the workplace. Professor Joan Williams, a founding director of the Center for WorkLife Law, noted that female employees are often forced to repeatedly prove their worth, while their male counterparts are judged on potential, and that many women struggle to balance assertiveness with likeability in the workplace.
The absence of flexible leave time is also an ongoing problem for both men and women, said Williams, noting that male employees who take parental leave frequently see their professional advancement stall.
But some companies are taking steps to correct these imbalances. New York Public Library General Counsel Michele Coleman Mayes recounted the measures that she took to minimize bias when doling out promotions, raises or bonuses in her former role as GC of Allstate Insurance Co.
Mayes' team, assuming that people have certain implicit biases, came up with “rules of engagement” that required those in charge of hiring or compensation decisions to look at an employee's measurable, recent performance, instead of allowing long-past mistakes or stereotypes to enter into the equation.
Another GC weighing in on the issues of leadership and women's advancement was Pfizer Inc.'s top lawyer, Amy Schulman, who noted that women are often too unwilling to use the goodwill that they have built up with colleagues or supervisors. “Don't be afraid to spend some of your political capital,” she advised.
In the end, Schulman said, an excellent leader—male or female—is someone who is motivated by passion, and who puts the strength of the business before their own individual advancement. “The further up you go, the less it is about you and the more it is about the organization,” she said.
Learn more about the New Girls' Network here.
For more career coverage on InsideCounsel, see:
Several prominent general counsel were among those weighing in on diversity, leadership and work-life balance at an event hosted by the New Girls' Network, an organization that aims to turn social science into real-life strategies for women looking to climb the corporate ladder.
In two separate discussions, panelists discussed the above topics, as well as the ways in which women—particularly mothers—still face bias in the workplace. Professor Joan Williams, a founding director of the Center for WorkLife Law, noted that female employees are often forced to repeatedly prove their worth, while their male counterparts are judged on potential, and that many women struggle to balance assertiveness with likeability in the workplace.
The absence of flexible leave time is also an ongoing problem for both men and women, said Williams, noting that male employees who take parental leave frequently see their professional advancement stall.
But some companies are taking steps to correct these imbalances.
Mayes' team, assuming that people have certain implicit biases, came up with “rules of engagement” that required those in charge of hiring or compensation decisions to look at an employee's measurable, recent performance, instead of allowing long-past mistakes or stereotypes to enter into the equation.
Another GC weighing in on the issues of leadership and women's advancement was
In the end, Schulman said, an excellent leader—male or female—is someone who is motivated by passion, and who puts the strength of the business before their own individual advancement. “The further up you go, the less it is about you and the more it is about the organization,” she said.
Learn more about the New Girls' Network here.
For more career coverage on InsideCounsel, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Unheard of Superpower': How Women's Soft Skills Can Drive Success in Negotiations
Want to Get Ahead in Your Career? Find a Truth Teller
Ex-eBay CLO Tells WIPL Attendees: You Can Toot Your Own Horn and 'Still Be a Humble Person'
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 5A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
Who Got The Work
Blank Rome partner Andrew T. Hambelton has stepped in to defend Fragrancenet.com in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 29 in New York Southern District Court by the Blakely Law Group, targets the defendants for allegedly selling counterfeit fragrance products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Lorna G. Schofield, is 1:24-cv-06521, Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. v. Quester (US) Enterprises, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Davis Polk & Wardwell partners Mari Grace and Edmund Polubinski III have entered appearances for Australia-based Bitcoin-mining company Iris Energy and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Eastern District Court by the Rosen Law Firm, contends that the defendants concealed the inadequacy of the company's site in Childress County, Texas, including it being 'ill-equipped' and unable to operate the company's proprietary design. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Peggy Kuo, is 1:24-cv-07046, Williams-Israel v. Iris Energy Limited et al.
Who Got The Work
Ryan S. Stippich of Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren has entered an appearance for biopharmaceutical company Veru Inc. and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Sept. 30 in Wisconsin Western District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of June Ovadias, accuses the defendant of failing to disclose that small sample sizes and other issues rendered it unlikely that the FDA would grant Emergency Use Authorization for the cancer drug candidate sabizabulin as a potential treatment for COVID-19. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge William M. Conley, is 3:24-cv-00676, Ovadias, June v. Steiner, Mitchell et al.
Who Got The Work
Holland & Knight partners Cynthia A. Gierhart and Thomas Willcox Brooke have entered appearances for Pakistani American Political Action Committee and Rao Kamran Ali in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The action, filed Sept. 24 in District of Columbia District Court by Jackson Walker on behalf of Pakistani American Public Affairs Committee, accuses the defendants of using a mark that's confusingly similar to the plaintiff's 'Pak-Pac' marks without authorization. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Randolph D. Moss, is 1:24-cv-02727, Pakistani American Public Affairs Committee v. Pakistani American Political Action Committee et al.
Who Got The Work
Lauren M. Rosenberg and Yonatan Even of Cravath, Swaine & Moore have stepped in to represent Israel-based Oddity Tech Ltd. in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Aug. 30 in New York Southern District Court by Pomerantz LLP and Holzer & Holzer, contends that the defendant made materially misleading statements regarding the capability of Oddity's AI technology and ongoing civil litigation, resulting in the artifical inflation of the market price of Oddity's securities. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Margaret M. Garnett, is 1:24-cv-06571, Hoare v. Oddity Tech Ltd. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250