Technology: What tech companies can learn from Coca-Cola
When it comes to protecting intellectual property, patents certainly get all the press.
April 19, 2013 at 05:15 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
When it comes to protecting intellectual property, patents certainly get all the press. Depending on the circumstances, there are instances where patent protection may not be the best option—namely instances where the publication of the very details of the innovative concept, as required for a patent, would be ruinous to the company. For the technology firm, there are other options for protecting valuable innovations, one of which is the primary focus of this article—trade secrets.
Trade secrets, generally speaking, may be virtually any kind of data, information, process or know-how that is not known or easily ascertained. In other words, a trade secret is…a secret. There are essentially two requirements for claiming that you have a trade secret:
- The trade secret must have economic value
- The secret must be kept “secret.”
With regard to the first element, while your mother's recipe for chocolate chip cookies might be spectacular, there is likely no real economic value associated with the recipe. On the other hand, think of the formula for Coca-Cola: It is certainly secret, and one cannot credibly argue against the economic value of that secret.
With regard to the second element, keeping your information secret, it is important to note that there is no singular method or process that is considered effective for maintaining secrecy. Rather, a number of techniques may be employed, for example:
- Legal documents: requiring persons exposed to the trade secret information to sign confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements with clear and effective penalties for breach
- Compartmentalizing information: not allowing one person to have knowledge of the entire trade secret (i.e. two employees each only have access to one-half of the formula, process, code, etc.)
- Education: informing your employees about the value of trade secrets, and the importance of maintaining their protection
- Physical and digital security: using all appropriate measures of security (i.e. locks, firewalls, scanners, permissions, badging, etc.) to prevent unauthorized access to the trade secret.
- Enforcement campaigns: It is imperative to take immediate action against all responsible parties upon receiving knowledge that your trade secret may have been leaked.
The list above is not exhaustive, but it is a sample of some of the most obvious measures required in order to maintain a trade secret.
Taking all of the above into account, the question arises—why trade secrets? The primary answer is that if you can properly maintain your trade secret it can last a lifetime. A patent provides you with complete exclusivity over your process or formula, but only for a defined period of time. Think, for example, if the Coca-Cola Co. had patented its original formula in 1886, that most famous trade secret would have been available to the public for a century now. By keeping it secret, however, the Coca Cola Company has maintained its exclusivity over that most famous beverage for more than 125 years. While Coca Cola's formula may be the most famous trade secret in the world, one can discern from using it as an example which other information or processes might be best kept secret rather than disclosed in a set of patent claims: chemical formulas and processes, software code, operational or logistical processes, and even magic tricks and their associated apparatuses.
A word of caution, however: Trade secrets are governed by state law. As such, you should consult with an attorney in the states where you conduct business in order to understand the specific requirements that the various states employ to protect and enforce trade secrets. Furthermore, 46 states have adopted the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, but Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina and Texas have not.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
Exits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute read'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Bar Groups Say IOLA Settlement Protects Civil Litigants' Fund From Future 'Raids'
- 2'Every MAGA Will Buy It:' Elon Musk Featured in Miami Crypto Lawsuit
- 3Pennsylvania Law Schools Are Seeing Double-Digit Boosts in 2025 Applications
- 4Meta’s New Content Guidelines May Result in Increased Defamation Lawsuits Among Users
- 5State Court Rejects Uber's Attempt to Move IP Suit to Latin America
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250