PETA buys stock in SeaWorld
The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has a reputation of going to great lengths in the interest of animal rights, so it may have seemed surprising when the organization bought a stake in SeaWorld on April 19.
April 29, 2013 at 07:51 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has a reputation of going to great lengths in the interest of animal rights, so it may have seemed surprising when the organization bought a stake in SeaWorld on April 19. But PETA has one very specific goal: Free the whales!
Last year, PETA sued SeaWorld claiming it violated the 13th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits slavery.
“We filed it on behalf of five wild orcas at SeaWorld in Orlando, arguing that they are enslaved in violation of the 13th Amendment,” Jeff Kerr, the PETA Foundation's GC, told InsideCounsel in February. “The 13th Amendment prohibits the condition of slavery without specification of class of victims. These orcas were ripped from their homes and families where they would have spent their entire lives and forced to perform for SeaWorld's profits, breed for future performance orcas and live in confined, concrete tanks that would be comparable to you or me living in a bathtub. These animals would swim 100 miles a day in the open ocean. By any reasonable definition, that is enslavement. If they can suffer from these prohibitive conditions, they should be entitled to the corresponding protection.”
Although PETA lost that case, its move earlier this month to buy a stake in SeaWorld is evidence it isn't giving up the fight. The organization bought 80 shares worth $2,273.70, which PETA said in a statement is “the smallest number of shares necessary to give us the right to attend and speak at annual meetings, and to submit shareholder resolutions asking for policy changes.” PETA went on to say its “first order of business” would be to demand the release of SeaWorld orca Corky, who PETA says “has been enslaved by SeaWorld for 44 years.”
“SeaWorld profits from depriving highly intelligent and social orcas and dolphins of everything that's natural and important to them and forcing them to perform meaningless tricks for a reward of dead fish,” said Jared Goodman, counsel for PETA Foundation. “As part owner in the company, we will submit shareholder proposals to educate other investors about the suffering endured by the orcas, dolphins, and other animals who are confined to tiny barren tanks for human amusement and push for their release. We are confident that investors will be outraged when they learn of the devastating effects of captivity and join us in calling for these animals to be retired to coastal sanctuaries and, where possible, rehabilitated and released into the ocean.”
Read CNN for more about this story.
For more PETA stories on InsideCounsel, see:
The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has a reputation of going to great lengths in the interest of animal rights, so it may have seemed surprising when the organization bought a stake in SeaWorld on April 19. But PETA has one very specific goal: Free the whales!
Last year, PETA sued SeaWorld claiming it violated the 13th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits slavery.
“We filed it on behalf of five wild orcas at SeaWorld in Orlando, arguing that they are enslaved in violation of the 13th Amendment,” Jeff Kerr, the PETA Foundation's GC, told InsideCounsel in February. “The 13th Amendment prohibits the condition of slavery without specification of class of victims. These orcas were ripped from their homes and families where they would have spent their entire lives and forced to perform for SeaWorld's profits, breed for future performance orcas and live in confined, concrete tanks that would be comparable to you or me living in a bathtub. These animals would swim 100 miles a day in the open ocean. By any reasonable definition, that is enslavement. If they can suffer from these prohibitive conditions, they should be entitled to the corresponding protection.”
Although PETA lost that case, its move earlier this month to buy a stake in SeaWorld is evidence it isn't giving up the fight. The organization bought 80 shares worth $2,273.70, which PETA said in a statement is “the smallest number of shares necessary to give us the right to attend and speak at annual meetings, and to submit shareholder resolutions asking for policy changes.” PETA went on to say its “first order of business” would be to demand the release of SeaWorld orca Corky, who PETA says “has been enslaved by SeaWorld for 44 years.”
“SeaWorld profits from depriving highly intelligent and social orcas and dolphins of everything that's natural and important to them and forcing them to perform meaningless tricks for a reward of dead fish,” said Jared Goodman, counsel for PETA Foundation. “As part owner in the company, we will submit shareholder proposals to educate other investors about the suffering endured by the orcas, dolphins, and other animals who are confined to tiny barren tanks for human amusement and push for their release. We are confident that investors will be outraged when they learn of the devastating effects of captivity and join us in calling for these animals to be retired to coastal sanctuaries and, where possible, rehabilitated and released into the ocean.”
Read CNN for more about this story.
For more PETA stories on InsideCounsel, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 2Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
- 3Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 4Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
- 5Luigi Mangione Defense Attorney Says NYC Mayor’s Comments on Case Raise Fair Trial Concerns
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250