Why building your personal brand is important
This issue of InsideCounsel focuses on the continuing social media discussion.
April 30, 2013 at 08:00 PM
7 minute read
This issue of InsideCounsel focuses on the continuing social media discussion. When your company views social media in a positive light (as an opportunity), it is always hyper-concerned about its branding and reputation. Those concepts win opportunities and consumers. Companies spend tremendous amounts of money solidifying brand and reputation through carefully crafted marketing material, and they fight with bare knuckles when that carefully constructed ideal comes under attack. How can you discuss and embrace these same concepts for you and your team?
It's important to distinguish between branding and reputation. As in-house lawyers, reputation is the way others see us as a result of our actions (or inaction). Branding is how we convey to others what they are to expect when they work with us. It creates preconceived notions of outcome. Lawyers know that reputation drives us when we are at law firms and in our in-house practice. However, we rarely use the term “branding” as it relates to our groups, our department and ourselves.
Notions of branding and reputation feed consistently into one another. As you work with others, each interaction should be carefully cultivated to portray an image to the other person that will gain his trust and faith. That person then helps build your reputation, and to the extent he shares his positive perception with others, he enhances your brand.
Your clients' perception of your abilities as an individual has a tremendous impact on your day and the future of your career. A client that sees you in a positive light may ease up a bit when you go over deadline because of bandwidth. A supervisor who views you as his ace will stand up for you if intracompany squabbles break out and you are at the epicenter.
Nick Nanton, a well-published personal-branding expert, stresses that in-house lawyers, with business clients as their “top and only clients,” should “do all the little things you would do for [them] if you were out on your own.”
As prideful people, lawyers sometimes say to me that “as long as I do great work, I don't have to impress others. I know I am a good lawyer, and the work speaks for itself.” It's a near certainty that your supervisors and clients will care deeply about how you make them look. If they come out as winners because of your efforts, your brand and reputation are internally enhanced. When you are working extreme hours to little or no fanfare or credit, think about the wins you are helping the company acquire through your protective efforts.
It's important to think about how your work can translate into enhancement of your own brand (via a resumé). Make sure you leave room for the big strategic items that win you internal points, as they also translate well if you ever want or need to seek new employment.
This philosophy creates both a reputation and forward-looking brand. That can be a powerful thing when it comes time to review budget, enhance the tools available to the department and allot bonuses. Those controlling the purse strings may not know how to qualify legal work product success. Their gut may win the day, and that has a tremendous effect on you and your team. This alone could make the self-evaluation of your personal brand and reputation—and that of your team—worthwhile.
Stephen Kaplan is senior vice president and general counsel of Connextions Inc.
This issue of InsideCounsel focuses on the continuing social media discussion. When your company views social media in a positive light (as an opportunity), it is always hyper-concerned about its branding and reputation. Those concepts win opportunities and consumers. Companies spend tremendous amounts of money solidifying brand and reputation through carefully crafted marketing material, and they fight with bare knuckles when that carefully constructed ideal comes under attack. How can you discuss and embrace these same concepts for you and your team?
It's important to distinguish between branding and reputation. As in-house lawyers, reputation is the way others see us as a result of our actions (or inaction). Branding is how we convey to others what they are to expect when they work with us. It creates preconceived notions of outcome. Lawyers know that reputation drives us when we are at law firms and in our in-house practice. However, we rarely use the term “branding” as it relates to our groups, our department and ourselves.
Notions of branding and reputation feed consistently into one another. As you work with others, each interaction should be carefully cultivated to portray an image to the other person that will gain his trust and faith. That person then helps build your reputation, and to the extent he shares his positive perception with others, he enhances your brand.
Your clients' perception of your abilities as an individual has a tremendous impact on your day and the future of your career. A client that sees you in a positive light may ease up a bit when you go over deadline because of bandwidth. A supervisor who views you as his ace will stand up for you if intracompany squabbles break out and you are at the epicenter.
Nick Nanton, a well-published personal-branding expert, stresses that in-house lawyers, with business clients as their “top and only clients,” should “do all the little things you would do for [them] if you were out on your own.”
As prideful people, lawyers sometimes say to me that “as long as I do great work, I don't have to impress others. I know I am a good lawyer, and the work speaks for itself.” It's a near certainty that your supervisors and clients will care deeply about how you make them look. If they come out as winners because of your efforts, your brand and reputation are internally enhanced. When you are working extreme hours to little or no fanfare or credit, think about the wins you are helping the company acquire through your protective efforts.
It's important to think about how your work can translate into enhancement of your own brand (via a resumé). Make sure you leave room for the big strategic items that win you internal points, as they also translate well if you ever want or need to seek new employment.
This philosophy creates both a reputation and forward-looking brand. That can be a powerful thing when it comes time to review budget, enhance the tools available to the department and allot bonuses. Those controlling the purse strings may not know how to qualify legal work product success. Their gut may win the day, and that has a tremendous effect on you and your team. This alone could make the self-evaluation of your personal brand and reputation—and that of your team—worthwhile.
Stephen Kaplan is senior vice president and general counsel of
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNetflix Music Guru Becomes First GC of Startup Helping Independent Artists Monetize Catalogs
2 minute readGlobal Software Firm Trying to Jump-Start Growth Hands CLO Post to 3-Time Legal Chief
Meta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250