Technology: Transforming innovation into value
Ideas are the lifeblood of any technology-based company, but for the company to succeed, the ideas must be translated and transformed into value.
May 03, 2013 at 03:41 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Ideas are the lifeblood of any technology-based company, but for the company to succeed, the ideas must be translated and transformed into value. Yet companies based on mediocre ideas are often wildly successful, and companies based on incredible innovations often fail. One difference between success and failure is managing the process that transforms ideas into IP and IP into value.
All of our previous articles have dealt with the intersection of IP and value in one form or another. In-house counsel play a critical role in managing the transformation of ideas into value. All IP is ultimately a legal construct. As the strength of patents, for example, within the courts and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) changes, the value of external threats and internal assets change with them.
We discussed the pitfalls and difficulties inherent in the valuation of IP obtained from mergers or acquisitions. We also discussed using the Pareto Principle (i.e., the 80/20 Rule) as a tool to guide the management of IP portfolios. Finally, we warned against neglecting nonpatent forms of IP. In a sense, these articles all addressed “internal” drivers of value—by innovation, acquisition and management of IP.
There are many other internal challenges to managing the transformation of innovation to value. Depending on the age or nature of your organization, your R&D department must transform from a cost center to a profit center. Although this can be a cultural evolution, in-house counsel can foster positive evolution by altering the incentive structures in R&D. Too few innovations might be impacted by increasing monetary and other incentives for new disclosures; too many narrow improvements might be impacted by implementing a review panel, for instance, or by offering equal or greater awards for internal design-arounds.
We also discussed how to preserve value by managing and assessing external threats. One of our articles discussed how NPEs can be deterred and your own litigation costs can be lowered by properly deploying reexaminations and the new PTO opposition proceedings—inter partes review and post-grant review. Additionally, we surveyed the changing landscape of patent infringement damages.
Other external threats need to be monitored and managed. Although sales and marketing often track the activities of direct-market competitors, technological competition may come from indirect sources. For instance, we can look at the market for batteries. Energizer and Duracell are two leading battery manufacturers and directly compete both in the market and technological developments. Yet, their biggest technological threat might come from fuel cell manufacturers, a cell phone manufacturer or from a solar power company that cannot compete against its own direct market competitors (e.g., wind, coal, gas, hydro) without a better battery. In-house counsel can more easily identify and assess this competition. Today's patent applications are tomorrow's products.
Ultimately, in-house counsel will need to assist their internal stakeholders in understanding the value of technological development and the parallel investments required to execute on technology advantages. In today's economy, in-house counsel need to build both a legal department and business operations around execution on the competitive advantage their technology brings to bear. Obtaining patents is just the beginning. Constantly adapting, assessing and advancing your company's technology base to meet tomorrow's demands is the real goal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute readLegal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
Trending Stories
- 1Being a Profession is Not Malarkey
- 2Bring NJ's 'Pretrial Opportunity Program' into the Open
- 3High-Speed Crash With Police Vehicle Nets $1.6 Million Settlement
- 4Embracing a ‘Stronger Together’ Mentality: Collaboration Best Practices for Attorneys
- 5Selling Law. How to Get Hired, Paid and Rehired
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250