Davis Wright Tremaine silences “Kitchen Nightmares” press conference
Reality TV fans are buzzing about a recent episode of Kitchen Nightmares. And because the show presents a slew of legal issues, InsideCounsels editors have been chatting about it too.
May 22, 2013 at 06:28 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Reality TV fans are buzzing about a recent episode of “Kitchen Nightmares.” And because the show presents a slew of legal issues, InsideCounsel's editors have been chatting about it too.
For those not familiar, Fox's “Kitchen Nightmares” features the notoriously tough and foul-mouthed British chef Gordon Ramsay. In each episode, he visits a struggling restaurant, berates its mistakes and helps it get back on track with better management, safer sanitary practices, a new menu and updated décor.
One recent episode featured Amy's Baking Co., a Scottsdale, Ariz., eatery with owners so crude they made Ramsay look like a saint. Cameras caught Amy and Samy Bouzaglo screaming and threatening their own customers, snatching up the wait staff's tips and firing innocent employees. (We encourage you to watch the full episode—you won't regret it.)
The episode is the first in “Kitchen Nightmares” history in which Ramsay walked away from a restaurant without having been able to help. To put it nicely, the Bouzaglos weren't open to his criticism—which isn't surprising, as one of their main complaints to Ramsay was the awful customer reviews they regularly receive on Yelp and Reddit.
After the show aired earlier this month, the couple took to Facebook to confront some viewers. As you can imagine, it didn't go well, and the Bouzaglos later claimed their Facebook account was hacked (yeah, right!).
Yesterday, the Bouzaglos planned to host a press conference to talk about their “Kitchen Nightmares” experience and mark their restaurant's reopening. But one brave partner at Davis Wright Tremaine, which represents the producer of “Kitchen Nightmares,” put a stop to it by reminding the Bouzaglos of their contractual obligations.
“We understand that you are planning a public event … at which you will discuss your experiences and your 'unflattering portrayals' on the show,” Davis Wright Tremaine Partner Alonzo Wickers wrote in a letter to the Bouzaglos. “If you speak about the show without [the producer's] and Fox's prior approval, and if you disparage the show, its host, or its producers, you will breach your obligations.” Wickers added that each Bouzaglo could be liable for $100,000 in liquidated damages.
So far, Davis Wright Tremaine's legal threats have worked, as the Bouzaglos promptly canceled their press conference. But we'll be sure to keep an eye on the drama that likely lies ahead.
Read Above the Law for more about the “Kitchen Nightmares” legal skirmish.
For more entertainment-related InsideCounsel stories, read:
Attorney suspended for harassing co-worker who starred in horror film
5 celebrity lawsuits in the news
“Jersey Boys” producers didn't violate copyright act, 9th Circuit says
Television's 13 greatest fictional lawyers
“Girls Gone Wild” files for bankruptcy
Protecting copyrights for films is a picture perfect position
Disney loses $319 million “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire” appeal
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute readLegal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250