Thousands of UC hospital employees continue strike
Thousands of employees walked off the job at five University of California (UC) medical centers on Tuesday, kicking off a planned two-day strike that aims to highlight purported staffing shortages at UC hospitals.
May 22, 2013 at 09:16 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Thousands of employees walked off the job at five University of California (UC) medical centers on Tuesday, kicking off a planned two-day strike that aims to highlight purported staffing shortages at UC hospitals.
The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, which represents almost 13,000 respiratory therapists, radiology technologists and vocational nurses, say that the strike was motivated by concerns over patient care. According to the striking workers, low staffing levels prevent them from devoting adequate time to all of their patients.
But hospital officials contend that the workers are really upset over proposed changes to their pension system, which other UC employees have already agreed to. A contract suggested by the university would require employees to pay more in contributions to their pension funds and would also change eligibility rules for retiree healthcare benefits, Thomson Reuters reports.
Although some workers chose to come to work despite the strike, the walkout has led to the postponement of hundreds of non-emergency surgeries and other procedures, the Los Angeles Times reports. Some of the medical facilities were diverting ambulances away from their emergency rooms, but others continued to operate as usual.
The strike, which affects UC medical centers in Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento and Irvine, is scheduled to end on Thursday morning.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the health care industry, see:
Thousands of employees walked off the job at five University of California (UC) medical centers on Tuesday, kicking off a planned two-day strike that aims to highlight purported staffing shortages at UC hospitals.
The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, which represents almost 13,000 respiratory therapists, radiology technologists and vocational nurses, say that the strike was motivated by concerns over patient care. According to the striking workers, low staffing levels prevent them from devoting adequate time to all of their patients.
But hospital officials contend that the workers are really upset over proposed changes to their pension system, which other UC employees have already agreed to. A contract suggested by the university would require employees to pay more in contributions to their pension funds and would also change eligibility rules for retiree healthcare benefits, Thomson Reuters reports.
Although some workers chose to come to work despite the strike, the walkout has led to the postponement of hundreds of non-emergency surgeries and other procedures, the Los Angeles Times reports. Some of the medical facilities were diverting ambulances away from their emergency rooms, but others continued to operate as usual.
The strike, which affects UC medical centers in Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento and Irvine, is scheduled to end on Thursday morning.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the health care industry, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRepublican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
4 minute readSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
4 minute readHow Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250