Judge OKs $19.5 million Dewey mismanagement deal
Former Dewey & LeBoeuf Chairman Steven Davis is off the hook for mismanagement claims brought by the storied firms estate in connection with its May 2012 bankruptcy.
May 31, 2013 at 09:20 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Former Dewey & LeBoeuf Chairman Steven Davis is off the hook for mismanagement claims brought by the storied firm's estate in connection with its May 2012 bankruptcy.
A federal judge on Thursday approved a settlement in which Davis and Dewey's insurance company, XL Specialty Insurance, will pay a combined $19.5 million to settle claims that Davis mismanaged the law firm into bankruptcy. The lion's share of the settlement will come from the insurer, with Davis on the hook for only $511,145.
The money will go to Dewey's secured creditors, including JP Morgan Chase & Co., along with unsecured creditors such as the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp., Thomson Reuters reports. Creditors have already recovered $71.5 million in a separate clawback settlement, in which former Dewey partners agreed to return between $5,000 and $3.5 million of their compensation in return for immunity against future lawsuits connected with the firm's Chapter 11.
Davis did not admit wrongdoing as part of the settlement, instead maintaining that “he fulfilled his fiduciary duties and at all times acted in what he reasonably believed was in the best interest of Dewey.”
For more InsideCounsel stories about Dewey's bankruptcy, see:
Former
A federal judge on Thursday approved a settlement in which Davis and Dewey's insurance company, XL Specialty Insurance, will pay a combined $19.5 million to settle claims that Davis mismanaged the law firm into bankruptcy. The lion's share of the settlement will come from the insurer, with Davis on the hook for only $511,145.
The money will go to Dewey's secured creditors, including
Davis did not admit wrongdoing as part of the settlement, instead maintaining that “he fulfilled his fiduciary duties and at all times acted in what he reasonably believed was in the best interest of Dewey.”
For more InsideCounsel stories about Dewey's bankruptcy, see:
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
GCs Jettisoning Zero-Based Budgeting in Quest to Be Nimble, More Efficient
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250