5 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines
A nose job gone terribly awry, a case of mistaken identity and three more strange lawsuits in the news
June 12, 2013 at 07:58 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
No Nose
A New York man hoping to reduce the size of his nose got more than he bargained for when he went in for plastic surgery. Vishal Thakkar sought out Tulsa, Okla. surgeon Angelo Cuzalina, who serves as president of the American Board of Cosmetic Surgery, for his first nose job in 2006. When the procedure allegedly left Thakkar with breathing problems, he returned for more than a dozen corrective surgeries over the next several years.
In the last of these procedures, Cuzalina cut off Thakkar's nose entirely—purportedly because it was infected—prompting the patient to file a lawsuit. In it, Thakkar also claims that Cuzalina took cartilage from his ears in an effort to rebuild his nose, even though Thakkar had specifically instructed him not to do so, and that he prescribed his patient enough painkillers to “easily kill a couple human beings.”
Mistaken Identity
A woman allegedly got a less-than-hospitable welcome at a Miami hotel when a group of prostitutes mistook her for a competitor. Anna Burgese says she and her husband Joseph were walking through the lobby of their hotel, the W South Beach, earlier this year when she was suddenly subjected to “a completely unprovoked, sudden and brutal attack” by a group of unidentified prostitutes.
The irate escorts—apparently afraid that Burgese would steal their customers—purportedly threw the New Jersey resident headfirst into a stone wall, tackled her and then escaped in a taxi with the help of hotel staff. The hotel is at fault, the Burgeses argue in a lawsuit, because it “fosters a prostitute-friendly environment … as evidenced by … reviews left on various travel websites.”
Reduced Riches
Most people would be thrilled to appear on Forbes' list of the world's billionaires. But Prince Alwaleed bin Talel, a Saudi Arabian businessman, was evidently more offended than honored when the magazine ranked him as the planet's 26th richest billionaire in its annual “Rich List.” The publication pegged Alwaleed's fortune at $20 billion, but the prince argues that his real fortune is actually worth closer to $30 billion.
Forbes also attracted the prince's ire by calculating his wealth based on the underlying valuation of his investment company, Kingdom Holdig Co., rather than by the price of its shares on the Saudi stock exchange, which Forbes has said “rises and falls based on factors that, coincidentally, seem more tied to the Forbes billionaires list than fundamentals.” Alwaleed is suing the publication for libel in the U.K., contending that its valuation system is “irrational and deeply flawed.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250