Dollar General sued over background check practice
Dollar General Corp. may want to rethink its standard practice of conducting background checks on potential employees.
June 12, 2013 at 07:28 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Dollar General Corp. may want to rethink its standard practice of conducting background checks on potential employees.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has filed suit against the discount retailer, claiming the practice has a negative impact on black applicants.
According to the EEOC's complaint, Dollar General instituted the background check policy—which the commission refers to as “illegal”—in 2004.
“People who have been convicted of crimes and have paid their 'debt to society,' eventually ought to have a fair shot in the job market — especially if the conviction was years earlier and had nothing to do with the job they seek,” John Rowe, director of the EEOC's Chicago-area office, said in a statement.
Under Dollar General's background check policy, the company conducts the check after the applicant is offered a job. A pass/fail is then communicated to the store's manager via email.
According to the EEOC, citing data it received from Dollar General, the retailer made 344,300 conditional job offers to potential employees between January 2004 and April 2007. Seventy-five percent of those offers were to non-black candidates—7 percent of those offers to non-black applicants were rescinded, while 10 percent of the offers made to blacks were rescinded.
“The gross disparity in the rates at which black and non-black conditional employees were discharged on account of defendant's criminal background check policy is statistically significant,” the EEOC complaint said in its complaint.
The EEOC is asking the court to bar the practice, as well as require the company to offer equal employment opportunities to black applicants. The commission also seeks a monetary award for the rejected applicants.
Read more recent labor and employment stories on InsideCounsel:
The
According to the EEOC's complaint,
“People who have been convicted of crimes and have paid their 'debt to society,' eventually ought to have a fair shot in the job market — especially if the conviction was years earlier and had nothing to do with the job they seek,” John Rowe, director of the EEOC's Chicago-area office, said in a statement.
Under
According to the EEOC, citing data it received from
“The gross disparity in the rates at which black and non-black conditional employees were discharged on account of defendant's criminal background check policy is statistically significant,” the EEOC complaint said in its complaint.
The EEOC is asking the court to bar the practice, as well as require the company to offer equal employment opportunities to black applicants. The commission also seeks a monetary award for the rejected applicants.
Read more recent labor and employment stories on InsideCounsel:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250