FTC reportedly launches oil price-fixing investigation
Wondering why gas prices are so high in parts of the country (Chicago, were looking at you)? So is the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
June 25, 2013 at 09:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Wondering why gas prices are so high in parts of the country (Chicago, we're looking at you)? So is the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which has launched an investigation into the pricing of crude oil and petroleum-derived products, according to a Bloomberg report.
The agency's investigation comes on the heels of a similar European Union probe, which also includes the pricing of crude oil-derived products and biofuels. Earlier this year, EU authorities raided the offices of Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Statoil ASA and BP Plc, and also reportedly looked into the methods of Platts, a McGraw Hill-owned price publisher whose price assessments are often used as a benchmark in energy markets.
The Department of Justice's antitrust division reportedly asked the FTC to handle the investigation, suggesting that any resulting charges would likely not be criminal, Bloomberg reports.
Past FTC investigations into oil prices have generally centered on market forces—such as problems at refineries or shifts in global demand—not the setting of benchmark prices, according to Reuters. But benchmarks have come under increased regulatory scrutiny in the past few years, notably when it was revealed that a group of British bankers had been manipulating the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor)—the benchmark for global interest rates.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is separately looking into reports of “spoofing” in the West Texas Intermediate crude-oil market. “Spoofing” occurs when a trader makes a bogus bid and then cancels it before the trade is completed.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the oil industry, see:
ExxonMobil seeks dismissal of Mayflower oil spill suits
Texas sues BP over Gulf oil spill
First phase of BP spill trial ends
BP faces more than 2,200 new spill lawsuits
Argentine court lifts freeze on Chevron assets in pollution case
Canadian judge stays claim for $19 billion Chevron judgment
Regulatory: What to expect in the energy sector
Nigerians seek $1 billion from Shell for oil spill pollution
ExxonMobil faces lawsuits over Yellowstone River oil spill
Wondering why gas prices are so high in parts of the country (Chicago, we're looking at you)? So is the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which has launched an investigation into the pricing of crude oil and petroleum-derived products, according to a Bloomberg report.
The agency's investigation comes on the heels of a similar European Union probe, which also includes the pricing of crude oil-derived products and biofuels. Earlier this year, EU authorities raided the offices of
The Department of Justice's antitrust division reportedly asked the FTC to handle the investigation, suggesting that any resulting charges would likely not be criminal, Bloomberg reports.
Past FTC investigations into oil prices have generally centered on market forces—such as problems at refineries or shifts in global demand—not the setting of benchmark prices, according to Reuters. But benchmarks have come under increased regulatory scrutiny in the past few years, notably when it was revealed that a group of British bankers had been manipulating the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor)—the benchmark for global interest rates.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is separately looking into reports of “spoofing” in the West Texas Intermediate crude-oil market. “Spoofing” occurs when a trader makes a bogus bid and then cancels it before the trade is completed.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the oil industry, see:
ExxonMobil seeks dismissal of Mayflower oil spill suits
Texas sues BP over Gulf oil spill
First phase of BP spill trial ends
BP faces more than 2,200 new spill lawsuits
Argentine court lifts freeze on
Canadian judge stays claim for $19 billion
Regulatory: What to expect in the energy sector
Nigerians seek $1 billion from Shell for oil spill pollution
ExxonMobil faces lawsuits over Yellowstone River oil spill
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Inspectors General Purge Could Make Policy Changes Easier, Observers Say
Keys to Maximizing Efficiency (and Vibes) When Navigating International Trade Compliance Crosschecks
6 minute readCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250