Technology: Navigating deemed export rules
There are several ways that you can violate U.S. export laws and breach your software licenses, without ever leaving the U.S. or directly shipping any technology outside the U.S. borders.
July 05, 2013 at 04:00 AM
10 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
If you are a U.S.-based company that is either a vendor of technology or simply a user of technology, there are several ways that you can violate U.S. export laws and breach your software licenses, without ever leaving the U.S. or directly shipping any technology outside the U.S. borders.
The Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) established the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), which deal with the export of “dual use” items, including technology and software that have both military and nonmilitary uses. The International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), established by the State Department, similarly governs “defense articles” and “defense services.” The EAR includes the Commerce Control List (CCL), which assigns an Export Classification Category Number (ECCN) to specific types of items that are subject to export regulation.
Both the EAR and the ITAR include “deemed export” provisions, which cover the disclosure of protected technology to foreign nationals. Under the deemed export rules of the EAR, technology or software is deemed to be “released” for export through: visual inspection by a foreign national of equipment or facilities in the U.S.; oral exchanges of information in the U.S. or abroad; or, application abroad of personal knowledge or technical experience acquired in the U.S. The deemed export rules cover basically any means of communication to a foreign national, including emails, conference calls and information made available on an intranet.
Under the EAR, a “foreign national” is generally anyone who is not a U.S. citizen, is not a permanent resident visa (green card) holder or does not have protected status, i.e., a refugee or an asylumee.
Accordingly, you can violate the deemed export rules in various unintended ways. For example, giving a tour of your company's facilities to a potential customer or business partner who is a foreign national could be a deemed export Allowing a U.S.-based employee of your company who is a foreign national to have access to protected software or technology could be a deemed export—even if the employee does not leave the U.S. Unless you have a proper deemed export license, such acts could violate the EAR and result in serious criminal, civil and administrative penalties, not only for your company but also for the involved individuals.
Further, these deemed export rules are being enforced. For example, when Suntek Microwave, among other export violations, failed to get a deemed export license for Chinese nationals who worked at Suntek and were trained in technology controlled by the EAR, the BIS imposed a $275,000 civil penalty and a 20-year denial of export privileges for the company, and the president of the company agreed to a $187,000 civil penalty and a 20-year denial of export privileges. In related criminal cases, Suntek was fined more than $339,000 and its president was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment and two years' supervised release.
Therefore, you need to put a program in place to prevent unintended violations of the deemed export rules.
You should first determine whether the technology your company uses or offers is subject to the EAR by checking the Commerce Control List. Information that is publicly available, i.e., has been released through print publications, presentations at public conferences or the web, is not subject to the EAR.
You should check the CCL to determine the ECCN for the technology or software your company offers. You also need to check on the software used by or licensed to your company. You should inquire of licensors providing your company with software how their software is classified under the CCL, particularly if their license agreement includes an export control clause.
Many software licenses contain export control clauses restricting export of the licensed software. The deemed export rules would apply here, too. So, in addition to being concerned with export laws, you need to comply with the deemed export rules to avoid being in breach of any export control restrictions in your software licenses.
Once you have determined the classification of the technology or software that your company offers, uses or is licensed to, you need to determine the status of the persons who will have access to the technology or software, i.e., their citizenship, residency and/or nationality. Note that this applies not only to the employees of your company but also to subcontractors your organization engages, such as consultants employed to work on the company's systems. Therefore, if any subcontractors or consultants will have access to your protected technology or software, you should inquire as to the citizenship, etc. of the people assigned to your project and/or obtain contractual representations that such people are not foreign nationals.
After you have collected information on the status of your employees and subcontractors, you need to establish a clearance program to control and prevent access of your protected technology to foreign national from countries of concern, such as China, Russia, Iran, India, Syria, Iraq and Pakistan. There are currently commercial software solutions available that provide deemed export compliance programs. If your technology or software requires an export license by the EAR and if you intend to give a foreign national access to the technology or software, you need to apply for a deemed export license.
Establishing a program to determine the export status of the technology or software offered and/or used by or licensed to your company and to control the access of such technology or software by your employees or subcontractors who may be foreign nationals will help your company avoid liabilities for violating U.S. export laws and for being in breach of your software licenses.
If you are a U.S.-based company that is either a vendor of technology or simply a user of technology, there are several ways that you can violate U.S. export laws and breach your software licenses, without ever leaving the U.S. or directly shipping any technology outside the U.S. borders.
The Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) established the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), which deal with the export of “dual use” items, including technology and software that have both military and nonmilitary uses. The International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), established by the State Department, similarly governs “defense articles” and “defense services.” The EAR includes the Commerce Control List (CCL), which assigns an Export Classification Category Number (ECCN) to specific types of items that are subject to export regulation.
Both the EAR and the ITAR include “deemed export” provisions, which cover the disclosure of protected technology to foreign nationals. Under the deemed export rules of the EAR, technology or software is deemed to be “released” for export through: visual inspection by a foreign national of equipment or facilities in the U.S.; oral exchanges of information in the U.S. or abroad; or, application abroad of personal knowledge or technical experience acquired in the U.S. The deemed export rules cover basically any means of communication to a foreign national, including emails, conference calls and information made available on an intranet.
Under the EAR, a “foreign national” is generally anyone who is not a U.S. citizen, is not a permanent resident visa (green card) holder or does not have protected status, i.e., a refugee or an asylumee.
Accordingly, you can violate the deemed export rules in various unintended ways. For example, giving a tour of your company's facilities to a potential customer or business partner who is a foreign national could be a deemed export Allowing a U.S.-based employee of your company who is a foreign national to have access to protected software or technology could be a deemed export—even if the employee does not leave the U.S. Unless you have a proper deemed export license, such acts could violate the EAR and result in serious criminal, civil and administrative penalties, not only for your company but also for the involved individuals.
Further, these deemed export rules are being enforced. For example, when Suntek Microwave, among other export violations, failed to get a deemed export license for Chinese nationals who worked at Suntek and were trained in technology controlled by the EAR, the BIS imposed a $275,000 civil penalty and a 20-year denial of export privileges for the company, and the president of the company agreed to a $187,000 civil penalty and a 20-year denial of export privileges. In related criminal cases, Suntek was fined more than $339,000 and its president was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment and two years' supervised release.
Therefore, you need to put a program in place to prevent unintended violations of the deemed export rules.
You should first determine whether the technology your company uses or offers is subject to the EAR by checking the Commerce Control List. Information that is publicly available, i.e., has been released through print publications, presentations at public conferences or the web, is not subject to the EAR.
You should check the CCL to determine the ECCN for the technology or software your company offers. You also need to check on the software used by or licensed to your company. You should inquire of licensors providing your company with software how their software is classified under the CCL, particularly if their license agreement includes an export control clause.
Many software licenses contain export control clauses restricting export of the licensed software. The deemed export rules would apply here, too. So, in addition to being concerned with export laws, you need to comply with the deemed export rules to avoid being in breach of any export control restrictions in your software licenses.
Once you have determined the classification of the technology or software that your company offers, uses or is licensed to, you need to determine the status of the persons who will have access to the technology or software, i.e., their citizenship, residency and/or nationality. Note that this applies not only to the employees of your company but also to subcontractors your organization engages, such as consultants employed to work on the company's systems. Therefore, if any subcontractors or consultants will have access to your protected technology or software, you should inquire as to the citizenship, etc. of the people assigned to your project and/or obtain contractual representations that such people are not foreign nationals.
After you have collected information on the status of your employees and subcontractors, you need to establish a clearance program to control and prevent access of your protected technology to foreign national from countries of concern, such as China, Russia, Iran, India, Syria, Iraq and Pakistan. There are currently commercial software solutions available that provide deemed export compliance programs. If your technology or software requires an export license by the EAR and if you intend to give a foreign national access to the technology or software, you need to apply for a deemed export license.
Establishing a program to determine the export status of the technology or software offered and/or used by or licensed to your company and to control the access of such technology or software by your employees or subcontractors who may be foreign nationals will help your company avoid liabilities for violating U.S. export laws and for being in breach of your software licenses.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGOP Now Holds FTC Gavel, but Dems Signal They'll Be a Rowdy Minority
6 minute readLongtime Purdue GC Accused of Drunken Driving Hires Big-Name Defense Attorney
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250