NCAA will not renew contract with EA Sports
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) will not renew its contract with gaming company Electronic Arts Inc., marking the end of the popular NCAA Football video game series.
July 18, 2013 at 08:35 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) will not renew its contract with gaming company Electronic Arts Inc., marking the end of the popular “NCAA Football” video game series.
The games have sold millions of copies since their 1997 inception, but have also led to some long-running litigation with former college football and basketball players who claim that the NCAA used their names and likenesses without paying them.
“We are confident in our legal position regarding the use of our trademarks in video games,” the NCAA said in a statement. “But given the current business climate and costs of litigation, we determined participating in this game is not in the best interests of the NCAA.”
Former UCLA basketball star Ed O'Bannon was the first college athlete to sue the NCAA, seeking compensation for live broadcasts and video game and memorabilia sales. Fellow collegiate athletes Bill Russell and Oscar Robertson have since joined the class action.
The video game series will continue, although the next installment will be rebranded “College Football 15” and will not include any NCAA trademarks. Instead EA Sports will license trademarks from individual colleges and from the Collegiate Licensing Company. The company discontinued its “NCAA Basketball” series in 2009.
“In deciding not to renew one of its most lucrative deals, the NCAA may foresee that it will not be able to collect licensing fees from EA Sports for much longer, without sharing the revenues with former and current student athletes,” Ulmer & Berne Partner Michael Marrero says. ”If that's the eventual outcome of O'Bannon v. NCAA, the deal may no longer be as lucrative for the NCAA, and any licensing fees that the NCAA continues to collect will only enhance the plaintiffs' damages claims.”
Read more InsideCounsel coverage of sports-related litigation:
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) will not renew its contract with gaming company
The games have sold millions of copies since their 1997 inception, but have also led to some long-running litigation with former college football and basketball players who claim that the NCAA used their names and likenesses without paying them.
“We are confident in our legal position regarding the use of our trademarks in video games,” the NCAA said in a statement. “But given the current business climate and costs of litigation, we determined participating in this game is not in the best interests of the NCAA.”
Former UCLA basketball star Ed O'Bannon was the first college athlete to sue the NCAA, seeking compensation for live broadcasts and video game and memorabilia sales. Fellow collegiate athletes Bill Russell and Oscar Robertson have since joined the class action.
The video game series will continue, although the next installment will be rebranded “College Football 15” and will not include any NCAA trademarks. Instead EA Sports will license trademarks from individual colleges and from the Collegiate Licensing Company. The company discontinued its “NCAA Basketball” series in 2009.
“In deciding not to renew one of its most lucrative deals, the NCAA may foresee that it will not be able to collect licensing fees from EA Sports for much longer, without sharing the revenues with former and current student athletes,”
Read more InsideCounsel coverage of sports-related litigation:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250