5 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines
Amelia Earhart's plane, a controversial advice column and three more lawsuits in the news
July 24, 2013 at 10:31 AM
9 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Successful Search?
The 1937 disappearance of Amelia Earhart is one of the world's great unresolved mysteries. Now, a new lawsuit alleges that the mystery was actually solved years ago, but the answer was then kept secret for monetary reasons.
Wyoming philanthropist Timothy Mellon says that he gave The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery (TIGHAR) $1 million to search for the aviatrix's downed plane. The aircraft recovery group contends that Earhart and her navigator, Fred Noonan, crash-landed on the isolated South Pacific atoll of Nikumaroro, although TIGHAR says it has not yet found the plane. Mellon, however, claims that a series of aerial photos taken in 2010 show the wreckage of Earhart's Lockheed Electra and human remains underwater. According to Mellon's suit, TIGHAR found the debris years ago, but kept the news under wraps to get more money out of him for unnecessary searches.
Slip & Scald
In a case that gives a whole new meaning to the term “freezer burn,” a Long John Silver's employee is suing the restaurant after allegedly suffering serious burns while melting ice in a walk-in freezer. Joshua Shepard says that in early 2011 the walk-in freezer at one of the chain's West Virginia locations sprung a leak, coating the freezer floor with ice. Instead of fixing the leak, restaurant supervisors reportedly asked Shepard to melt the ice with 200-degree water.
As is wont to happen when walking on icy surfaces, Shepard reportedly slipped and poured scalding water all over himself. He suffered first-, second- and third-degree burns over 12 percent of his body, according to his lawsuit. He claims that the injuries resulted in severe pain and interfered with his daily activities, and is now seeking more than $1 million.
Deaf Discrimination
A group of deaf customers are suing Starbucks Corp., claiming that the coffee shop's employees denied them service and repeatedly mocked them because of their disability. One of the 12 plaintiffs, for instance, claims that when he attempted to place a written order at one of the chain's Manhattan locations, a worker told him that the store would not serve deaf patrons.
The most egregious alleged offense came in March 2013, when the plaintiffs say that a Starbucks manager called the police to break up their monthly “Deaf Coffee Chat.” According to the suit, the employee told the police that most of the group members were not paying customers—since some had brought their own coffee—and that they did not have a permit to meet at the store. The police reprimanded the employee for the call, according to the lawsuit, which is seeking unspecified damages.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250