Marvel can keep rights to the Fantastic Four and other comic book characters
Marvel Entertainment won a smackdown at the 2nd Circuit on Thursday in its dispute with the children of comic book artist Jack Kirby
August 09, 2013 at 06:19 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Wham! Pow! Biff!
Marvel Entertainment, LLC won a smackdown at the 2nd Circuit on Thursday in its dispute with the children of comic book artist Jack Kirby, who created many of the brand's famous superheroes, including the Incredible Hulk and the Fantastic Four.
Kirby's children have been engaging in legal fisticuffs with Marvel for a couple years now, trying to take back the rights to the characters their father created in tandem with the famous Stan Lee. But the 2nd Circuit in its Thursday ruling said that those characters were legally “work-for-hire” and therefore belonged to Marvel.
“It is beyond dispute that most of Kirby's work during this period was published by Marvel and for established Marvel titles,” the court wrote.
As superhero movies continue to knock out at the box office, issues of character ownership have been critical for Marvel of late. The company is currently facing another lawsuit from Ghost Rider creator Gary Friedrich, who the 2nd Circuit said in June might have a valid claim to the character's rights.
Read more at the Wall Street Journal.
For more comic-centric lawsuits on InsideCounsel, see below:
2nd Circuit finds agreement over Ghost Rider copyright “ambiguous”
Superman co-creator's daughter has no rights to the character
Warner Bros. wins latest round in Superman copyright conundrum
Owner of Tarzan and John Carter characters sues over allegedly infringing comics
Wham! Pow! Biff!
Kirby's children have been engaging in legal fisticuffs with Marvel for a couple years now, trying to take back the rights to the characters their father created in tandem with the famous Stan Lee. But the 2nd Circuit in its Thursday ruling said that those characters were legally “work-for-hire” and therefore belonged to Marvel.
“It is beyond dispute that most of Kirby's work during this period was published by Marvel and for established Marvel titles,” the court wrote.
As superhero movies continue to knock out at the box office, issues of character ownership have been critical for Marvel of late. The company is currently facing another lawsuit from Ghost Rider creator Gary Friedrich, who the 2nd Circuit said in June might have a valid claim to the character's rights.
Read more at the Wall Street Journal.
For more comic-centric lawsuits on InsideCounsel, see below:
2nd Circuit finds agreement over Ghost Rider copyright “ambiguous”
Superman co-creator's daughter has no rights to the character
Warner Bros. wins latest round in Superman copyright conundrum
Owner of Tarzan and John Carter characters sues over allegedly infringing comics
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
FTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute read
Wells Fargo and Bank of America Agree to Pay Combined $60 Million to Settle SEC Probe
‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
