New Internet domain name options are coming: Is your organization ready?
In the new world of generic top-level domains, domain names will take on trademark significance for the first time in the history of the Internet.
August 16, 2013 at 09:32 AM
9 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
This writing updates an earlier InsideCounsel article discussing the new gTLD system from a policy and strategic perspective.
In the new world of generic top-level domains (gTLDs)—the first of which are poised to launch by the end of the month—domain names will take on trademark significance for the first time in the history of the Internet. In a world where virtually any word—from a whole-industry description, to a company title, to the name of a specific branded product—may be subject to registration by anyone with the will and resources to apply, it is important for companies to be aware of new procedures and mechanisms in place to protect their intellectual property in the online space.
Background on top-level domains
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is the nonprofit company contracted by the U.S. government responsible for coordinating activities necessary to the operation of the Internet's underlying address book, the Domain Name System.
For many years, ICANN made available for registration only a handful of Top-Level Domains (TLDs), such as .com and .net. In the early 2000s, ICANN expanded the number of domains considerably to include .biz, .info, .name, etc. Then, in a major move commencing a further staged expansion that continues rolling out to this day, on January 12, 2012, ICANN began accepting applications to register nearly anything to the right of the “dot.”
Impact of the new generic top-level domains
As more and more businesses around the world joined the digital space, ICANN determined there was a need to expand the options available for domain names. And the new gTLDs provide some important positive opportunities. High on the list is the opportunity for new registries to police their participants, ensuring that the goods sold under those registries are genuine, that brands are represented in accordance with the law and best practice, and that participating businesses are themselves legitimate and willing and able to stand behind the products and services they provide over the Internet.
Of course, the proliferation of new gTLDs brings with it the downside of new opportunities for pirates and squatters to unfairly capitalize on the reputation and good will resulting from the investments of legitimate companies. ICANN has considered this negative potential and has put measures in place to address the potential for illegitimate registrations.
For one, the cost of registering a new gTLD to the right of the dot—$185,000 initially and $25,000 per year thereafter—is much higher than the nominal cost of registering an old-fashioned domain to the left of the dot. Other ICANN deterrence measures include a “trademark clearinghouse” (opened on March 26) to warn potential registrants and mark owners of an attempt to register a listed mark, “sunrise registrations” providing a 30-day window before opening a new gTLD to the public to allow a mark owner to register its mark first, and “uniform rapid suspensions” to allow mark owners to quickly and cost-effectively freeze infringing domain names where there is no genuine issue as to infringement and abuse taking place.
Current status of the gTLD program
ICANN announced at its July 14 to July 18, session that 1,092 new gTLDs have passed the initial evaluation process since the application window opened on January 12, 2012. These applicants will soon begin contracting with ICANN on a rolling basis to launch their new gTLDs, assuming there are no objections through the various intervention processes put in place by ICANN.
Among the new gLTDs are company-specific domains such as .intel and .gucci, industry-wide domains such as .wine and .luxury, and broadly applicable domains such as .fun and .repair. The Russian words for “online” and “website,” the Arabic word for “web” and the Chinese word for “game” will be the first gTLDs to launch—as early as this month—as ICANN announced at its July session that registry agreements for these domains have been signed.
The first major dispute over gTLDs also appears to have been resolved. ICANN's Governmental Advisory Council has recommended rejection of the online retailer Amazon's application for the .amazon domain in view of objections from Brazil, Argentina, Peru and Chile. These countries successfully argued that .amazon should be protected as a geographical name (clothing company Patagonia withdrew its application for .patagonia after a similar objection raised by Argentina).
Additional resources
To evaluate the opportunities created and risks that the new gTLD program poses to your organization, and to develop a strategy to protect your brands online, it is recommended that you consult a trademark attorney.
For more information on the new gTLD program, visit the ICANN website: http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/
For a searchable list of gTLD applications and their status:
To register with the Trademark Clearinghouse:
This writing updates an earlier InsideCounsel article discussing the new gTLD system from a policy and strategic perspective.
In the new world of generic top-level domains (gTLDs)—the first of which are poised to launch by the end of the month—domain names will take on trademark significance for the first time in the history of the Internet. In a world where virtually any word—from a whole-industry description, to a company title, to the name of a specific branded product—may be subject to registration by anyone with the will and resources to apply, it is important for companies to be aware of new procedures and mechanisms in place to protect their intellectual property in the online space.
Background on top-level domains
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is the nonprofit company contracted by the U.S. government responsible for coordinating activities necessary to the operation of the Internet's underlying address book, the Domain Name System.
For many years, ICANN made available for registration only a handful of Top-Level Domains (TLDs), such as .com and .net. In the early 2000s, ICANN expanded the number of domains considerably to include .biz, .info, .name, etc. Then, in a major move commencing a further staged expansion that continues rolling out to this day, on January 12, 2012, ICANN began accepting applications to register nearly anything to the right of the “dot.”
Impact of the new generic top-level domains
As more and more businesses around the world joined the digital space, ICANN determined there was a need to expand the options available for domain names. And the new gTLDs provide some important positive opportunities. High on the list is the opportunity for new registries to police their participants, ensuring that the goods sold under those registries are genuine, that brands are represented in accordance with the law and best practice, and that participating businesses are themselves legitimate and willing and able to stand behind the products and services they provide over the Internet.
Of course, the proliferation of new gTLDs brings with it the downside of new opportunities for pirates and squatters to unfairly capitalize on the reputation and good will resulting from the investments of legitimate companies. ICANN has considered this negative potential and has put measures in place to address the potential for illegitimate registrations.
For one, the cost of registering a new gTLD to the right of the dot—$185,000 initially and $25,000 per year thereafter—is much higher than the nominal cost of registering an old-fashioned domain to the left of the dot. Other ICANN deterrence measures include a “trademark clearinghouse” (opened on March 26) to warn potential registrants and mark owners of an attempt to register a listed mark, “sunrise registrations” providing a 30-day window before opening a new gTLD to the public to allow a mark owner to register its mark first, and “uniform rapid suspensions” to allow mark owners to quickly and cost-effectively freeze infringing domain names where there is no genuine issue as to infringement and abuse taking place.
Current status of the gTLD program
ICANN announced at its July 14 to July 18, session that 1,092 new gTLDs have passed the initial evaluation process since the application window opened on January 12, 2012. These applicants will soon begin contracting with ICANN on a rolling basis to launch their new gTLDs, assuming there are no objections through the various intervention processes put in place by ICANN.
Among the new gLTDs are company-specific domains such as .intel and .gucci, industry-wide domains such as .wine and .luxury, and broadly applicable domains such as .fun and .repair. The Russian words for “online” and “website,” the Arabic word for “web” and the Chinese word for “game” will be the first gTLDs to launch—as early as this month—as ICANN announced at its July session that registry agreements for these domains have been signed.
The first major dispute over gTLDs also appears to have been resolved. ICANN's Governmental Advisory Council has recommended rejection of the online retailer Amazon's application for the .amazon domain in view of objections from Brazil, Argentina, Peru and Chile. These countries successfully argued that .amazon should be protected as a geographical name (clothing company Patagonia withdrew its application for .patagonia after a similar objection raised by Argentina).
Additional resources
To evaluate the opportunities created and risks that the new gTLD program poses to your organization, and to develop a strategy to protect your brands online, it is recommended that you consult a trademark attorney.
For more information on the new gTLD program, visit the ICANN website: http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/
For a searchable list of gTLD applications and their status:
To register with the Trademark Clearinghouse:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Rocket Docket': EDVA Judge Controls Google's Fate in Ad Tech Monopoly Trial
4 minute readTarget's Don Liu: 4 Fortune 500 GC Posts, a Singular Focus on Opening Doors for Asian Americans
9 minute read'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5Monsanto Moves to Pause PCB Trial That Starts This Week
Who Got The Work
Blank Rome partner Andrew T. Hambelton has stepped in to defend Fragrancenet.com in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 29 in New York Southern District Court by the Blakely Law Group, targets the defendants for allegedly selling counterfeit fragrance products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Lorna G. Schofield, is 1:24-cv-06521, Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. v. Quester (US) Enterprises, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Davis Polk & Wardwell partners Mari Grace and Edmund Polubinski III have entered appearances for Australia-based Bitcoin-mining company Iris Energy and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Eastern District Court by the Rosen Law Firm, contends that the defendants concealed the inadequacy of the company's site in Childress County, Texas, including it being 'ill-equipped' and unable to operate the company's proprietary design. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Peggy Kuo, is 1:24-cv-07046, Williams-Israel v. Iris Energy Limited et al.
Who Got The Work
Ryan S. Stippich of Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren has entered an appearance for biopharmaceutical company Veru Inc. and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Sept. 30 in Wisconsin Western District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of June Ovadias, accuses the defendant of failing to disclose that small sample sizes and other issues rendered it unlikely that the FDA would grant Emergency Use Authorization for the cancer drug candidate sabizabulin as a potential treatment for COVID-19. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge William M. Conley, is 3:24-cv-00676, Ovadias, June v. Steiner, Mitchell et al.
Who Got The Work
Holland & Knight partners Cynthia A. Gierhart and Thomas Willcox Brooke have entered appearances for Pakistani American Political Action Committee and Rao Kamran Ali in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The action, filed Sept. 24 in District of Columbia District Court by Jackson Walker on behalf of Pakistani American Public Affairs Committee, accuses the defendants of using a mark that's confusingly similar to the plaintiff's 'Pak-Pac' marks without authorization. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Randolph D. Moss, is 1:24-cv-02727, Pakistani American Public Affairs Committee v. Pakistani American Political Action Committee et al.
Who Got The Work
Lauren M. Rosenberg and Yonatan Even of Cravath, Swaine & Moore have stepped in to represent Israel-based Oddity Tech Ltd. in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Aug. 30 in New York Southern District Court by Pomerantz LLP and Holzer & Holzer, contends that the defendant made materially misleading statements regarding the capability of Oddity's AI technology and ongoing civil litigation, resulting in the artifical inflation of the market price of Oddity's securities. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Margaret M. Garnett, is 1:24-cv-06571, Hoare v. Oddity Tech Ltd. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250