Portland files copyright lawsuit over public bathrooms
Portland wants to flush away the competition in the public bathroom market, and it is now filing a lawsuit to make sure its intellectual property rights are preserved.
August 26, 2013 at 07:42 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Portland, Ore., wants to flush away the competition in the public bathroom market, and it is now filing a lawsuit to make sure its intellectual property rights are preserved.
The city, which manufactures outdoor bathrooms called the “Portland Loo,” is suing Southern Oregon company Romtec Inc. over its “Sidewalk Restroom.” According to the Associated Press, Portland claims the Sidewalk Restroom infringes on the city's copyright and is interfering with the company's efforts to sell its product.
“After the success of the Portland Loo, Romtec now seeks to usurp the urban market with its Sidewalk Restroom, which is an obvious knock-off of the Portland Loo,” the city says in its lawsuit (PDF).
The suit says both outdoor restrooms feature open slats at the top and bottom to let police see how many people are inside, as well as an anti-graffiti coating and an outside hand-washing station to promote shorter use. Portland sells its model for $90,000; the lawsuit claims Romtec sells theirs for “significantly cheaper.”
Portland learned of the Sidewalk Restroom from the Cincinnati, which has been looking into purchasing several Portland Loos. The Cincinnati press has widely covered the city's negotiations with Portland over the Loo.
According to Romtec's company website, the company has sold outdoor restrooms to clients such as the U.S. Forest Service, the National Park Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Bureau of Land Management.
For more strange lawsuits, check out these InsideCounsel stories:
Portland, Ore., wants to flush away the competition in the public bathroom market, and it is now filing a lawsuit to make sure its intellectual property rights are preserved.
The city, which manufactures outdoor bathrooms called the “Portland Loo,” is suing Southern Oregon company Romtec Inc. over its “Sidewalk Restroom.” According to
“After the success of the Portland Loo, Romtec now seeks to usurp the urban market with its Sidewalk Restroom, which is an obvious knock-off of the Portland Loo,” the city says in its lawsuit (PDF).
The suit says both outdoor restrooms feature open slats at the top and bottom to let police see how many people are inside, as well as an anti-graffiti coating and an outside hand-washing station to promote shorter use. Portland sells its model for $90,000; the lawsuit claims Romtec sells theirs for “significantly cheaper.”
Portland learned of the Sidewalk Restroom from the Cincinnati, which has been looking into purchasing several Portland Loos. The Cincinnati press has widely covered the city's negotiations with Portland over the Loo.
According to Romtec's company website, the company has sold outdoor restrooms to clients such as the U.S. Forest Service, the National Park Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Bureau of Land Management.
For more strange lawsuits, check out these InsideCounsel stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250