SEC may approve CEO pay disclosure rule
Its been long in the making, but it looks like a new rule, originally proposed in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 may finally take affect.
August 27, 2013 at 08:59 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
It's been long in the making, but it looks like a new rule, originally proposed in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 may finally take affect.
Next month, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is expected to approve a rule that will require public companies to report the wage gap between their CEOs and rank-and-file employees, according to recent report from The Wall Street Journal.
The purpose of the law is two fold, according to industry experts: 1) It will likely put pressure on companies to slow the pay increases of their CEOs and; 2) it will give shareholders a more transparent view of their investment.
“The more information shareholders have about compensation the better they can understand what they are getting on their investment,” Mark Williams, a former Fed Reserve Bank examiner and now a teacher a Boston University, recently told Forbes.
The new rule, which the SEC is likely to approve early next month, is less onerous than previously proposed under Dodd-Frank. Rather than requiring companies to survey its entire workforce, the expected law will only require companies to survey a sample of its employees to calculate median pay, WSJ reported. The law also requires companies to publish the results.
Critics of the rule, which include large corporations and republican lawmakers, claim the requirement will be costly and burdensome on companies. While republicans on the five-member SEC have signaled they may not back the proposed rule, the SEC's two democrats, as well as independent Chairman Mary Jo White, are likely to support it, the WSJ reported.
Read more about this story on WSJ and Forbes.
Read more stories related to Dodd-Frank on InsideCounsel:
5th Circuit says whistleblowers not protected from retaliation if they report internally
Spotlight on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Regulatory: Companies should take action on employee tips in light of the SEC whistleblower program
Regulatory: Why is “abusive” the most feared word in Dodd-Frank?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGOP Now Holds FTC Gavel, but Dems Signal They'll Be a Rowdy Minority
6 minute readTrump's Inspectors General Purge Could Make Policy Changes Easier, Observers Say
Keys to Maximizing Efficiency (and Vibes) When Navigating International Trade Compliance Crosschecks
6 minute readCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
Trending Stories
- 1Chinese Firms Hire Partners from Kirkland and Paul Hastings in Hong Kong
- 2'He Used Some Colorful Language': Yale Defamation Case Survives
- 3Man Charged in Daylong Shooting Rampage in Memphis Is Serving as His Own Lawyer
- 4Counterpoint: FLA Is Committed To the Success of Legal Professionals
- 5Pa. Superior Court Rules Pizza Chain Liable for Franchisee Driver's Crash
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250