NFL settles class action concussion suit for $765 million
The league has agreed to a settlement to put the class action suit to rest, agreeing to pay $765 million for injury settlements and medical benefits for retired players.
August 29, 2013 at 11:55 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
For the past few years, the National Football League (NFL) has been hounded by questions over player safety. On the forefront of the player safety movement was a class action lawsuit brought on account of 4,500 former players or their estates against the NFL, claiming the league did not perform due diligence in preventing head injuries.
Today, the major weapon in the fight against the NFL has been settled.
The league has agreed to a settlement to put the class action suit to rest, agreeing to pay $765 million for injury settlements and medical benefits for retired players. In addition, the NFL agreed to fund medical and safety research as well as pay all litigation expenses.
The agreement comes after two months of negotiations under the eye of court-appointed mediator Judge Layn Phillips. “This is a historic agreement, one that will make sure that former NFL players who need and deserve compensation will receive it, and that will promote safety for players at all levels of football,” Judge Phillips said in a statement released Thursday morning by the Alternative Dispute Resolution Center (PDF).
The settlement will now go to United States District Judge Anita B. Brody for approval. She is expected to hear any appeals and approve the settlement within the next few weeks.
Most familiar with the case call the settlement a victory for the league. Each of the league's 32 franchises will be forced to pay roughly $30 million towards the settlement. By comparison, the NFL salary cap for the 2013 season sits at $123 million. The NFL as a whole makes $9-10 billion per season.
As part of the pre-trial settlement, the NFL makes no admission of any wrongdoing. The league will pay half of the settlement over the next three years, then the other half of the settlement in the following 17 years.
For the past few years, the National Football League (NFL) has been hounded by questions over player safety. On the forefront of the player safety movement was a class action lawsuit brought on account of 4,500 former players or their estates against the NFL, claiming the league did not perform due diligence in preventing head injuries.
Today, the major weapon in the fight against the NFL has been settled.
The league has agreed to a settlement to put the class action suit to rest, agreeing to pay $765 million for injury settlements and medical benefits for retired players. In addition, the NFL agreed to fund medical and safety research as well as pay all litigation expenses.
The agreement comes after two months of negotiations under the eye of court-appointed mediator Judge Layn Phillips. “This is a historic agreement, one that will make sure that former NFL players who need and deserve compensation will receive it, and that will promote safety for players at all levels of football,” Judge Phillips said in a statement released Thursday morning by the Alternative Dispute Resolution Center (PDF).
The settlement will now go to United States District Judge
Most familiar with the case call the settlement a victory for the league. Each of the league's 32 franchises will be forced to pay roughly $30 million towards the settlement. By comparison, the NFL salary cap for the 2013 season sits at $123 million. The NFL as a whole makes $9-10 billion per season.
As part of the pre-trial settlement, the NFL makes no admission of any wrongdoing. The league will pay half of the settlement over the next three years, then the other half of the settlement in the following 17 years.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute read
Baker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
