Facts & Figures: Top CEOs face poor performance rates
From Apple's patent troll problems to U.S. litigation costs, an inside look at the numbers that count
September 06, 2013 at 05:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Top Level Failure
A recent report by left-wing think tank Policy Studies identified 241 CEOs who have ranked the top 25 in yearly compensation since 1993 and compared their pay with their performance. The study went beyond simply shareholder return, also examining the company's overall financial situation (including bankruptcy status and bailout funds given). Policy Studies found that a surprising number of CEOs failed their test: A staggering 38 percent of the CEOs received a failing rating.
8% Top CEOs ousted by their corporate boards
8% Top CEOs' companies that had to pay fines due to corporate misconduct
22% Top CEOs' companies that either collapsed or were bailed out by U.S. taxpayers
Bite of the Apple
Apple Inc. is well known for its innovative products among industry insiders and consumers alike. However, there is a third group that knows all about Apple's focus on innovation as well: patent trolls. And those trolls have attempted to exploit Apple more than any other technology company, according to patent analytics company PatentFreedom. In a recently-released report, Apple has been on the receiving end of more patent troll lawsuits than any other technology company by more than 25 percent.
171 Patent troll lawsuits against Apple during the past five years
137 Troll suits against Hewlett-Packard over the past five years, the second-highest of any tech company
44 Troll suits against Apple in 2012, the highest single figure for any tech company in the past five years
30 Troll suits against AT&T as of June 30, the most of any tech company the first half of this year
The Fight for Jobs
Have you recently graduated law school but can't find a job? Don't worry, you've got plenty of company. But cheer up, says Bernard Burk of the University of North Carolina School of Law, because the job market is improving. Surprisingly, though, the reason for the market's projected improvement isn't the amount of jobs available. It's the supply of law school graduates.
Burk's paper suggests there will be fewer law school graduates in the future, making life easier for those who do graduate and wish to find a job. However, Burk also said it will be the job opportunities at smaller, lower-paid firms that will likely see the decrease in competition, with top firms remaining as competitive as ever.
46,000 Law school graduates in the Class of 2012
26,000 Class of 2012 law school graduates who found law jobs directly out of school
Battle of the Sexes
Looking to stay out of trouble with the law? Perhaps the best way may just be to hire a woman. A recent American Sociological Review (ASR) report indicates that women commit less corporate fraud than men. The ASR looked at 83 cases of corporate fraud that were registered with the Department of Justice, involving 436 defendants. Of those 83 cases, a majority were committed by men alone, whether a single man or a group of only men. None of the cases were committed by a standalone woman or group of only women.
75% Corporate fraud cases that involved only men and no women
59% Men who made more than $500,000 through corporate fraud
33% Men who made more than $1 million through corporate fraud
>50% Women who made “little to no money” through corporate fraud
Land of the Litigation
When InsideCounsel wrote about how the U.S. legal system is the world's most costly according to a U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform report back in August, one respondent on Twitter answered, “Yes, and water is wet.” True, America's reputation precedes it, but the figures surrounding America's litigious nature are astounding.
Only one Western European country had its total liability costs top 1 percent of GDP in 2011: the United Kingdom at 1.05 percent. Canada was slightly ahead of the British Isles, coming in at 1.19 percent. And the U.S., you ask? Look up and keep going: The United States' liability costs came in at 1.66 percent of GDP, over three times higher than the European average.
1.66% U.S. liability costs as a fraction of GDP
0.63% Eurozone liability costs as a fraction of GDP
0.40% Netherlands liability costs as a fraction of GDP, the lowest among all European countries in the study
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Unheard of Superpower': How Women's Soft Skills Can Drive Success in Negotiations
Want to Get Ahead in Your Career? Find a Truth Teller
Ex-eBay CLO Tells WIPL Attendees: You Can Toot Your Own Horn and 'Still Be a Humble Person'
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250