Cybersecurity a top concern for general counsel
Cybersecurity is no longer just the purview of IT departments, but rather the concern of entire organizations, from workers who bring their own devices to the office all the way up to the highest C-level executives, and this includes a crucial role for general counsels.
September 10, 2013 at 05:00 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Part of the philosophy behind the Department of Homeland Security's “If You See Something, Say Something” campaign hinges on the idea that we are all collectively responsible for each other's safety. It's not just the responsibility of law enforcement to keep us secure, as it might have been in the past. This same paradigm shift is as true in the digital world as it is on the streets. Cybersecurity is no longer just the purview of IT departments, but rather the concern of entire organizations, from workers who bring their own devices to the office all the way up to the highest C-level executives, and this includes a crucial role for general counsel.
Not just an IT issue
These days, intellectual property and consumer data are among the most valuable commodities, and cyber criminals are doing everything in their power to steal as much of this information as possible. This type of theft has become one of the greatest legal risks to organizations, and many new laws have been passed to regulate the protection of this information.
Paul Williams, office managing partner at Major, Lindsey & Africa, explains:
A big part of the GC's role is risk identification, analysis and management in an ever-increasing number of ways. An organization's Compliance group, as well as its Privacy function, may report up through the Law Department. GCs, particularly those in consumer-facing companies, in public companies, those that contract with the government, and in companies with highly valued and protected public images, are increasingly called upon to help manage crises that arise from cyber attacks. As a public company director, I know that boards expect their GCs to provide real-time analysis and guidance on all components of risk mitigation, including Cybersecurity. In the digital age, news of these attacks (particularly those involving the theft of customers' credit card, healthcare information, and other highly sensitive data) can go viral around the world within minutes, having an immediate effect on a brand's reputation and standing in the marketplace. With regard to their organizations' own intellectual property, GCs also sit squarely on the front lines in helping to ensure important business assets remain secure and that their risks – legal and otherwise – are kept at a minimum.
New legislation
One factor contributing to the urgency of cybersecurity initiatives is the increasing number of laws that have been passed in this area. The most prominent governmental mandate of recent vintage was the Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity Executive Order, signed by President Obama in February.
The order calls for the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to develop a standardized cybersecurity preparedness and response plan – a framework that is being developed with input from the private sector. A draft of the framework is due in October and should be finalized by February 2014. As companies develop their own cyber plans around this framework, it is imperative that general counsel be involved in the process, as the plan will establish disclosure and compliance guidelines that will be followed in the event of a breach.
Sherrie Farrell, office managing partner, Detroit and Diversity Committee Chair, Dykema, explains the relevance of this order as it relates to general counsel:
The Cybersecurity Executive Order, first and foremost, is a critical recognition of the growing importance of cybersecurity issues in both public and private sectors. It also is a recognition that these issues are continuing to evolve, and we must be proactive in implementing strategies to deal with them. The Cybersecurity Executive Order orders the creation and release of a federal government-supported cybersecurity best practices model (known as the “Framework”). Although adoption of the Framework is voluntary, the federal government's focus on identifying, implementing and partnering with public and private sector businesses certainly should signal heightened awareness for general counsel. For example, groups of businesses and lawyers regularly have been working with the government to determine the best practices. The findings of these workshops will be made public. Likely, GC will find that their organizations could benefit from these best practices.
This spring, Congress passed several pieces of legislation focused on ways the federal government can bolster cybersecurity. It would behoove general counsel to follow these and future laws to keep up to date on compliance obligations.
Prosecution and Protection
Typically, general counsel play an important role in the criminal prosecution of cyberattacks. They help determine if prosecution makes sense, in terms of whether it is in a company's best interest and if it is even possible.
Furthermore, general counsels can help create and maintain cybersecurity measures to help protect a company's data. GCs can lead the way by:
- Advising senior management/board members on legal responsibilities;
- Spearheading preparedness, response and compliance initiatives;
- Including cybersecurity terms in supply chain and IP contracts; and
- Managing potential lawsuits.
As for the future, Farrell sees an increasing need for general counsel to focus on cybersecurity:
Legal departments should be prepared to address the intersection of cybersecurity and compliance within their organizations. The start of a federal cybersecurity compliance program could result in new government regulated disclosures and duty of care obligations. The Executive Order has prompted Congressional action, both through Framework adoption incentive proposals and efforts to codify the Executive Order. However, even without increased attention from the federal government, corporations need to be proactive in ensuring compliance with existing federal and state regulations, establishing the necessary controls, understanding the risks and having a plan in the event of a cyber threat or breach.
The topic is a large and complex one, so for general counsels who want more information, several sources are available. A recent white paper from Dykema discusses many of these topics in greater detail, and an upcoming event, “To Protect and Defend: Why Cybersecurity Matters and What You Can Do to Guard Against Unwanted Intruders” will provide a host of thought leadership on the topic.
The event will take place on Thursday, Sept. 12, 2013 at the Renaissance Conference Center in Detroit, Mich. It will feature general counsel from Trustwave, Motorola and Bridgewater as they discuss cybersecurity risks and their impact on business practices and functions.
For more information on the event, click here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute readLegal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250