Median pay for corporate directors increases modestly to $227K
Cash retainers for directors grew 7 percent at the median to a high of $80,000. Total cash compensation grew to $100,000
September 18, 2013 at 06:03 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Corporate directors might be getting more cash now than they did a year ago, but it's a modest increase given the expansion of boards' responsibilities, according to a recent analysis by consulting firm Towers Watson & Co.
Last year, the median pay for outside directors at the 500 largest U.S. companies was $227,000, up 3 percent from $220,000 in 2011. While directors usually receive a mix of equity, cash and fees for attending meetings, the increase was driven by growth in cash compensation, according to Doug Friske, global head of executive compensation consulting at Towers Watson, which analyzed proxies through June 30.
“Cash retainers are playing a larger role in the compensation mix for outside directors as the majority of companies have now eliminated meeting fees, reflecting the evolution of director roles to 24/7 commitments,” Friske said in a statement. “While director pay increases in the early years of this decade were primarily driven by rising equity values, last year's increase was fueled by growth in cash compensation.”
Cash retainers for directors grew 7 percent at the median to a high of $80,000. Total cash compensation grew to $100,000. Stock awards didn't increase at the median last year.
Federal regulations have also impacted director pay: Since the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, audit committees have typically had the highest-paid directors due to their increased responsibilities and greater time commitment. The Dodd-Frank Act has also led to more meetings with shareholders, and thus, bigger commitments from compensation committee directors.
“Directors on the compensation committee also saw a jump in pay last year as the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act and its required 'say-on-pay' votes have led to more disclosures and meetings with shareholders,” The Wall Street Journal's Emily Chasan noted in a blog post.
While retainers are rising, companies are shifting away from paying board members for attending meetings. In fact, just over a quarter (28 percent) of companies paid meeting fees to directors, down from 32 percent in 2011.
“The demand for experienced, talented directors to serve on boards remains strong and will likely grow as companies address the retirement of long-standing members and pursue greater member diversity,” Friske added. “As a result, we expect companies will continue to evaluate their overall director compensation programs and policies to ensure they are able to attract the best directors to their boards.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInternal Whistleblowing Surged Globally in 2024, So Why Were US Numbers Flat?
6 minute readFTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Supreme Court Reinstates Corporate Disclosure Law Pending Challenge
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250