FTC settles with Florida company over 42 million fraudulent texts
The commission charged Rentbro and its executives with unfair or deceptive acts, a violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
September 19, 2013 at 07:32 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Hey, would you like to win a free gift card worth up to $1,000? All you need to do is respond to a text message… with your name, social security number and credit card information.
If that sounds sketchy to you, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) agrees: It settled charges on Sept. 17 with a Florida company that sent out more than 42 million unsolicited and deceptive text messages to consumers promising free gift cards.
The FTC required Rentbro, and its two top executives Daniel Pessin and Jacob Engel, to turn over the company's assets and pay back $377,321, the amount the business had collected from the scheme. According to the New York Times, the FTC charged Rentbro and its executives with unfair or deceptive acts, a violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
The Times reports that FTC Midwest Director C. Steven Baker claims the agency had received fewer complaints about Rentbro's unwarranted texts since filing the cases.
In March, the FTC instituted a host of new rules governing privacy on mobile devices. Among the instituted rules are that compliance with FTC rules must be visible on a webpage (and not in a hyperlink) if a company's website does not default to a mobile setting. In Rentbro's case, the website that the fraudulent texts directed customers to contained none of the requisite compliance information.
The commission has also recently cracked down on other instaces of text message fraud, filing eight cases against 29 plaintiffs from around the country for sending fake offers via text. One of those cases has already been settled, as the FTC received $60,950 from Henry Nolan Kelly, an Internet marketer accused of fraudulently offering new iPhones via text.
Hey, would you like to win a free gift card worth up to $1,000? All you need to do is respond to a text message… with your name, social security number and credit card information.
If that sounds sketchy to you, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) agrees: It settled charges on Sept. 17 with a Florida company that sent out more than 42 million unsolicited and deceptive text messages to consumers promising free gift cards.
The FTC required Rentbro, and its two top executives Daniel Pessin and Jacob Engel, to turn over the company's assets and pay back $377,321, the amount the business had collected from the scheme. According to the
The Times reports that FTC Midwest Director C. Steven Baker claims the agency had received fewer complaints about Rentbro's unwarranted texts since filing the cases.
In March, the FTC instituted a host of new rules governing privacy on mobile devices. Among the instituted rules are that compliance with FTC rules must be visible on a webpage (and not in a hyperlink) if a company's website does not default to a mobile setting. In Rentbro's case, the website that the fraudulent texts directed customers to contained none of the requisite compliance information.
The commission has also recently cracked down on other instaces of text message fraud, filing eight cases against 29 plaintiffs from around the country for sending fake offers via text. One of those cases has already been settled, as the FTC received $60,950 from Henry Nolan Kelly, an Internet marketer accused of fraudulently offering new iPhones via text.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250